ISVBF vs. CAS
ISVBF (iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF) and CAS (Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF) are both China Equities funds. ISVBF is passively managed, while CAS is actively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISVBF charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for CAS.
Performance
ISVBF vs. CAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ISVBF
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -9.22%
- YTD
- -14.80%
- 6M
- -14.96%
- 1Y
- -6.39%
- 3Y*
- 7.90%
- 5Y*
- -6.63%
- 10Y*
- —
CAS
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISVBF vs. CAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ISVBF iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | -8.14% |
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF | 1.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISVBF and CAS is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISVBF vs. CAS — Risk / Return Rank
ISVBF
CAS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ISVBF vs. CAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF) and Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISVBF | CAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.68 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISVBF vs. CAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISVBF drawdown since its inception was -53.78%, which is greater than CAS's maximum drawdown of -6.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISVBF and CAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISVBF | CAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.78% | -6.84% | -46.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.95% | -1.47% | -29.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.68% | -2.62% | -30.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.39% | — | — |
Volatility
ISVBF vs. CAS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISVBF | CAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.55% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.94% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.86% | 27.80% | +3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.32% | 27.80% | +2.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.14% | 27.80% | +2.34% |
ISVBF vs. CAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISVBF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CAS's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISVBF vs. CAS - Dividend Comparison
ISVBF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF | 0.35% |
ISVBF iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISVBF and CAS have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISVBF is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISVBF is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for CAS.
CAS has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.00% for ISVBF.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ISVBF and 0.88% for CAS.
Find the right allocation for ISVBF and CAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer