ISUL vs. CRMG
ISUL (GraniteShares 2X Long ISRG Daily ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISUL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMG.
Performance
ISUL vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISUL achieves a -53.77% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -71.55% return.
ISUL
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -17.32%
- YTD
- -53.77%
- 6M
- -55.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMG
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -30.36%
- YTD
- -71.55%
- 6M
- -71.72%
- 1Y
- -75.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISUL vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ISUL GraniteShares 2X Long ISRG Daily ETF | -53.77% | 55.46% |
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | -71.55% | 10.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISUL and CRMG is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISUL vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank
ISUL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRMG
ISUL vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2X Long ISRG Daily ETF (ISUL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISUL | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.78 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.99 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.73 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISUL vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISUL drawdown since its inception was -57.63%, smaller than the maximum CRMG drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISUL and CRMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISUL | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.63% | -79.83% | +22.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -76.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.63% | -79.19% | +21.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.41% | -39.31% | +12.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 43.67% | — |
Volatility
ISUL vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISUL | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 32.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 63.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.60% | 76.09% | -10.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.60% | 75.27% | -9.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.60% | 75.27% | -9.67% |
ISUL vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISUL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISUL vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison
Neither ISUL nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ISUL and CRMG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for ISUL.
ISUL and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for ISUL and 0.75% for CRMG.
Find the right allocation for ISUL and CRMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer