PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISUL vs. BMNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISUL vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2X Long ISRG Daily ETF (ISUL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISUL achieves a -52.15% return, which is significantly higher than BMNG's -75.13% return.


ISUL

1D
2.45%
1M
-20.59%
YTD
-52.15%
6M
-53.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BMNG

1D
-12.21%
1M
-48.30%
YTD
-75.13%
6M
-85.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISUL vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ISUL and BMNG is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISUL vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2X Long ISRG Daily ETF (ISUL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ISUL vs. BMNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISULBMNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.54

-0.52

-0.02

Drawdowns

ISUL vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISUL drawdown since its inception was -57.20%, smaller than the maximum BMNG drawdown of -95.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISUL and BMNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISULBMNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.20%

-95.36%

+38.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.15%

-95.36%

+39.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.10%

-81.38%

+57.28%

Volatility

ISUL vs. BMNG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISULBMNGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.65%

191.58%

-124.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.65%

191.58%

-124.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.65%

191.58%

-124.93%

ISUL vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISUL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BMNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISUL vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison

Neither ISUL nor BMNG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ISUL and BMNG have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for ISUL.

ISUL and BMNG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for ISUL and 0.75% for BMNG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISUL and BMNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer