PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISSC vs. UHS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ISSC vs. UHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. (ISSC) and Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISSC achieves a -2.43% return, which is significantly higher than UHS's -32.68% return. Over the past 10 years, ISSC has outperformed UHS with an annualized return of 21.80%, while UHS has yielded a comparatively lower 1.37% annualized return.


ISSC

1D
-4.59%
1M
13.55%
YTD
-2.43%
6M
65.59%
1Y
46.20%
3Y*
38.47%
5Y*
24.62%
10Y*
21.80%

UHS

1D
0.25%
1M
-13.06%
YTD
-32.68%
6M
-34.07%
1Y
-14.04%
3Y*
1.73%
5Y*
-1.29%
10Y*
1.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISSC vs. UHS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISSC
Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc.
-2.43%121.78%0.12%3.77%25.32%0.61%29.83%158.41%-23.13%-11.71%
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
-32.68%22.02%18.19%8.83%9.37%-5.16%-4.00%23.62%3.16%6.93%

Correlation

The correlation between ISSC and UHS is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2000

0.12

Fundamentals

EPS

ISSC:

$0.94

UHS:

$31.29

PE Ratio

ISSC:

19.62

UHS:

4.68

PEG Ratio

ISSC:

0.50

UHS:

0.20

PS Ratio

ISSC:

3.69

UHS:

0.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

ISSC:

$90.56M

UHS:

$17.76B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ISSC:

$44.22M

UHS:

$12.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

ISSC:

$26.70M

UHS:

$2.79B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISSC vs. UHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISSC
ISSC Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ISSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISSC Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ISSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISSC Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

UHS
UHS Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
UHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
UHS Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
UHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
UHS Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISSC vs. UHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. (ISSC) and Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISSCUHSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.93

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

-0.37

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.59

-0.89

+2.48

ISSC vs. UHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISSC Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is higher than the UHS Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISSC and UHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISSC vs. UHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISSC drawdown since its inception was -89.03%, which is greater than UHS's maximum drawdown of -60.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISSC and UHS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISSCUHSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.03%

-60.27%

-28.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.83%

-41.52%

-16.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.83%

-41.52%

-16.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.83%

-44.90%

-12.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.41%

-56.30%

-6.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.53%

-39.85%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.58%

-14.82%

-35.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.63%

17.33%

+14.30%

Volatility

ISSC vs. UHS - Volatility Comparison

Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. (ISSC) has a higher volatility of 25.92% compared to Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) at 7.25%. This indicates that ISSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISSCUHSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.92%

7.25%

+18.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.82%

25.18%

+40.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.28%

31.46%

+51.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.11%

31.82%

+27.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.12%

34.37%

+22.75%

Dividends

ISSC vs. UHS - Dividend Comparison

ISSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISSC
Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.00%17.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
0.55%0.37%0.45%0.52%0.57%0.62%0.15%0.42%0.34%0.35%0.38%0.33%

Financials

ISSC vs. UHS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
22.37M
4.50B
(ISSC) Total Revenue
(UHS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ISSC vs. UHS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
51.1%
0
Portfolio components
ISSC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. reported a gross profit of 11.43M and revenue of 22.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.1%.

UHS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ISSC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.94M and revenue of 22.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.1%.

UHS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 502.86M and revenue of 4.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.

ISSC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. reported a net income of 3.43M and revenue of 22.37M, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.

UHS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a net income of 348.68M and revenue of 4.50B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ISSC and UHS have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISSC has higher volatility (25.92%) compared to UHS (7.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISSC dropped -89.03% vs UHS's -60.27%.

ISSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISSC and UHS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer