ISRG vs. IXC
ISRG (Intuitive Surgical, Inc.) is a stock, while IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Over the past 10 years, ISRG returned 18.37%/yr vs 9.23%/yr for IXC. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ISRG vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISRG achieves a -28.96% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 27.41% return. Over the past 10 years, ISRG has outperformed IXC with an annualized return of 18.37%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.23% annualized return.
ISRG
- 1D
- 3.43%
- 1M
- -3.53%
- 6M
- -25.68%
- YTD
- -28.96%
- 1Y
- -21.52%
- 3Y*
- 4.37%
- 5Y*
- 4.90%
- 10Y*
- 18.37%
IXC
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- 6M
- 21.42%
- YTD
- 27.41%
- 1Y
- 36.71%
- 3Y*
- 16.54%
- 5Y*
- 21.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
ISRG vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISRG Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | -28.96% | 8.51% | 54.72% | 27.14% | -26.15% | 31.76% | 38.39% | 23.43% | 31.23% | 72.64% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 27.41% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISRG and IXC is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2001 | 0.31 |
The correlation between ISRG and IXC shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISRG vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
ISRG
IXC
ISRG vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISRG | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.32 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 2.40 | -3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 7.55 | -8.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISRG vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISRG drawdown since its inception was -82.26%, which is greater than IXC's maximum drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISRG and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISRG | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.26% | -67.88% | -14.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.99% | -15.36% | -20.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.83% | -19.06% | -18.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.90% | -24.93% | -24.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.90% | -64.16% | +14.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.09% | -8.30% | -25.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.32% | -17.45% | -3.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.69% | 4.88% | +12.81% |
Volatility
ISRG vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) has a higher volatility of 11.98% compared to iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) at 6.19%. This indicates that ISRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISRG | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.98% | 6.19% | +5.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.65% | 15.89% | +6.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.31% | 19.32% | +12.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.59% | 23.44% | +10.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.58% | 26.81% | +5.77% |
Dividends
ISRG vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
ISRG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISRG Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.98% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISRG and IXC have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISRG has higher volatility (11.98%) compared to IXC (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISRG dropped -82.26% vs IXC's -67.88%.
IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISRG and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer