PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISRA vs. IAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISRA vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISRA achieves a 14.05% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's 2.98% return. Over the past 10 years, ISRA has underperformed IAU with an annualized return of 10.83%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively higher 13.31% annualized return.


ISRA

1D
-2.47%
1M
-1.80%
YTD
14.05%
6M
17.88%
1Y
41.95%
3Y*
26.30%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
10.83%

IAU

1D
-0.98%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
2.98%
6M
5.50%
1Y
32.20%
3Y*
31.29%
5Y*
18.32%
10Y*
13.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISRA vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISRA
VanEck Israel ETF
14.05%36.98%26.03%-0.08%-25.76%10.06%28.21%26.77%-7.04%15.07%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
2.98%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between ISRA and IAU is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2013

0.06

The correlation between ISRA and IAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.17 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ISRA vs. IAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISRA
IAU

Financial Services

38.3%

-

Technology

22.2%

-

Healthcare

11.8%

-

Industrials

10.5%

-

Utilities

5.0%

-

Real Estate

4.7%
100.0%

Energy

2.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.9%

-

Communication Services

1.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.5%

-

Basic Materials

0.2%

-

Financial Services

ISRA
38.3%
IAU

-

Technology

ISRA
22.2%
IAU

-

Healthcare

ISRA
11.8%
IAU

-

Industrials

ISRA
10.5%
IAU

-

Utilities

ISRA
5.0%
IAU

-

Real Estate

ISRA
4.7%
IAU
100.0%

Energy

ISRA
2.1%
IAU

-

Consumer Cyclical

ISRA
1.9%
IAU

-

Communication Services

ISRA
1.8%
IAU

-

Consumer Defensive

ISRA
1.5%
IAU

-

Basic Materials

ISRA
0.2%
IAU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISRA vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISRA
ISRA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ISRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISRA Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ISRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISRA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISRA vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISRAIAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.24

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

1.69

+2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.53

4.19

+10.34

ISRA vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISRA Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISRA and IAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISRAIAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.23

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

1.03

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.84

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.62

-0.15

Drawdowns

ISRA vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISRA drawdown since its inception was -45.02%, roughly equal to the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISRA and IAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISRAIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.02%

-45.14%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.02%

-19.18%

+8.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.74%

-19.18%

-8.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.02%

-20.93%

-24.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.02%

-21.82%

-23.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.73%

-17.70%

+12.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.19%

-15.96%

+4.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

7.71%

-4.81%

Volatility

ISRA vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU) have volatilities of 5.30% and 5.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISRAIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

5.50%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.91%

23.02%

-8.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.84%

26.42%

-5.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.87%

17.95%

+3.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.91%

15.90%

+5.01%

ISRA vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISRA vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

ISRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISRA
VanEck Israel ETF
1.30%1.48%1.21%1.89%1.36%1.28%0.17%1.38%0.76%1.58%1.62%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISRA and IAU have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAU has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to ISRA (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISRA dropped -45.02% vs IAU's -45.14%.

On 10-year performance, IAU leads with 13.31% vs 10.83% for ISRA. On fees, IAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, ISRA has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IAU has performed better with a 13.31% return vs 10.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ISRA.

ISRA has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.

ISRA is categorized as Global Equities, while IAU is Gold. ISRA tracks BlueStar Israel Global Index, while IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ISRA and 0.25% for IAU.

ISRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISRA and IAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer