ISRA vs. GINX
ISRA (VanEck Israel ETF) and GINX (SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF) are both Global Equities funds. ISRA is passively managed, while GINX is actively managed. Over the past year, ISRA returned 30.85% vs 29.80% for GINX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISRA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for GINX.
Performance
ISRA vs. GINX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISRA achieves a 12.29% return, which is significantly lower than GINX's 14.11% return.
ISRA
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 5.07%
- YTD
- 12.29%
- 1Y
- 30.85%
- 3Y*
- 23.27%
- 5Y*
- 9.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
GINX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 9.99%
- YTD
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- 29.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISRA vs. GINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF | 12.29% | 36.98% | 18.68% |
GINX SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF | 14.11% | 25.06% | 5.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISRA and GINX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2024 | 0.51 |
The correlation between ISRA and GINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
ISRA vs. GINX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISRA
GINX
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Financial Services
ISRA
GINX
Technology
ISRA
GINX
Healthcare
ISRA
GINX
Industrials
ISRA
GINX
Utilities
ISRA
GINX
Real Estate
ISRA
GINX
Energy
ISRA
GINX
Consumer Cyclical
ISRA
GINX
Communication Services
ISRA
GINX
Consumer Defensive
ISRA
GINX
Basic Materials
ISRA
GINX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISRA vs. GINX — Risk / Return Rank
ISRA
GINX
ISRA vs. GINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) and SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISRA | GINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.44 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 3.36 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.94 | 12.79 | -4.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISRA vs. GINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISRA drawdown since its inception was -45.02%, which is greater than GINX's maximum drawdown of -12.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISRA and GINX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISRA | GINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.02% | -12.53% | -32.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.65% | -8.91% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.20% | -0.04% | -6.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.16% | -1.76% | -9.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 2.34% | +1.56% |
Volatility
ISRA vs. GINX - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) has a higher volatility of 7.05% compared to SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX) at 3.04%. This indicates that ISRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISRA | GINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.05% | 3.04% | +4.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.56% | 9.64% | +6.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.19% | 12.10% | +9.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.18% | 13.76% | +8.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 13.76% | +7.26% |
ISRA vs. GINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than GINX's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISRA vs. GINX - Dividend Comparison
ISRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than GINX's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GINX SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF | 2.08% | 2.81% | 2.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF | 1.32% | 1.48% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 1.28% | 0.17% | 1.38% | 0.76% | 1.58% | 1.62% | 1.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISRA and GINX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISRA has higher volatility (7.05%) compared to GINX (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISRA dropped -45.02% vs GINX's -12.53%.
On 1-year performance, ISRA leads with 30.85% vs 29.80% for GINX. On fees, ISRA is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, GINX has been the lower-risk option at 3.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ISRA has performed better with a 30.85% return vs 29.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISRA is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for GINX.
GINX has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 1.32% for ISRA.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Summit Global Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ISRA and 0.98% for GINX.
GINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISRA and GINX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer