ISRA vs. AGQI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ISRA (VanEck Israel ETF) and AGQI (First Trust Active Global Quality Income ETF) are both Global Equities funds. ISRA is passively managed, while AGQI is actively managed. Over the past year, ISRA returned 41.47% vs 24.01% for AGQI. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISRA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for AGQI.

Performance

ISRA vs. AGQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) and First Trust Active Global Quality Income ETF (AGQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISRA achieves a 14.50% return, which is significantly higher than AGQI's 11.27% return.

ISRA

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -2.52%
• YTD: 14.50%
• 6M: 16.99%
• 1Y: 41.47%
• 3Y*: 26.23%
• 5Y*: 9.22%
• 10Y*: 10.78%

AGQI

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 2.06%
• YTD: 11.27%
• 6M: 12.49%
• 1Y: 24.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISRA vs. AGQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF	14.50%	36.98%	26.03%	9.72%
AGQI First Trust Active Global Quality Income ETF	11.27%	26.67%	2.98%	5.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ISRA and AGQI is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2023	0.55

The correlation between ISRA and AGQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISRA vs. AGQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ISRA	AGQI
Financial Services	38.3%	14.7%
Technology	22.2%	17.4%
Healthcare	11.8%	9.6%
Industrials	10.5%	11.4%
Utilities	5.0%	6.2%
Real Estate	4.7%	-
Energy	2.1%	10.4%
Consumer Cyclical	1.9%	5.5%
Communication Services	1.8%	6.6%
Consumer Defensive	1.5%	14.6%
Basic Materials	0.2%	3.6%

Return for Risk

ISRA vs. AGQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISRA

ISRA Risk / Return Rank: 66
ISRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
ISRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
ISRA Omega Ratio Rank: 57
ISRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
ISRA Martin Ratio Rank: 76

AGQI

AGQI Risk / Return Rank: 59
AGQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
AGQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
AGQI Omega Ratio Rank: 62
AGQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
AGQI Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISRA vs. AGQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) and First Trust Active Global Quality Income ETF (AGQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ISRA	AGQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	2.07	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	2.80	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.37	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.78	2.64	+1.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.30	9.43	+4.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ISRA vs. AGQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISRA Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the AGQI Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISRA and AGQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ISRA	AGQI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	2.07	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	1.46	-0.99

Drawdowns

ISRA vs. AGQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISRA drawdown since its inception was -45.02%, which is greater than AGQI's maximum drawdown of -14.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISRA and AGQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISRA	AGQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.02%	-14.07%	-30.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.02%	-9.15%	-1.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.02%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.35%	-0.22%	-4.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.18%	-2.17%	-9.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	2.55%	+0.36%

Volatility

ISRA vs. AGQI - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to First Trust Active Global Quality Income ETF (AGQI) at 3.66%. This indicates that ISRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISRA	AGQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.18%	3.66%	+1.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.88%	9.39%	+5.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.84%	11.67%	+9.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.86%	12.56%	+9.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.91%	12.56%	+8.35%

ISRA vs. AGQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than AGQI's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISRA vs. AGQI - Dividend Comparison

ISRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than AGQI's 2.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AGQI First Trust Active Global Quality Income ETF	2.03%	2.54%	2.14%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF	1.29%	1.48%	1.21%	1.89%	1.36%	1.28%	0.17%	1.38%	0.76%	1.58%	1.62%	1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISRA and AGQI in my portfolio?

ISRA and AGQI have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ISRA or AGQI?

ISRA has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to AGQI (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISRA dropped -45.02% vs AGQI's -14.07%.

Which ETF is better, ISRA or AGQI?

On 1-year performance, ISRA leads with 41.47% vs 24.01% for AGQI. On fees, ISRA is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, AGQI has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ISRA or AGQI?

Over the 1-year period, ISRA has performed better with a 41.47% return vs 24.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ISRA or AGQI?

ISRA is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for AGQI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ISRA or AGQI?

AGQI has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 1.29% for ISRA.

What is the main difference between ISRA and AGQI?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ISRA and 0.85% for AGQI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AGQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.