PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISPY vs. QQA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISPY vs. QQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF (ISPY) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISPY achieves a 6.57% return, which is significantly lower than QQA's 10.93% return.


ISPY

1D
-0.12%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
6.57%
6M
5.30%
1Y
19.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQA

1D
-1.26%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
10.93%
6M
9.65%
1Y
25.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISPY vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ISPY
ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF
6.57%13.15%4.10%
QQA
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
10.93%17.24%5.92%

Correlation

The correlation between ISPY and QQA is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2024

0.89

The correlation between ISPY and QQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISPY vs. QQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISPY
QQA

Technology

33.2%
58.7%

Financial Services

20.0%
0.2%

Communication Services

8.6%
14.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
11.4%

Healthcare

7.1%
3.7%

Industrials

6.7%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
6.4%

Energy

2.6%
0.5%

Utilities

2.2%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.5%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.5%
1.0%

Technology

ISPY
33.2%
QQA
58.7%

Financial Services

ISPY
20.0%
QQA
0.2%

Communication Services

ISPY
8.6%
QQA
14.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ISPY
8.0%
QQA
11.4%

Healthcare

ISPY
7.1%
QQA
3.7%

Industrials

ISPY
6.7%
QQA
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

ISPY
3.9%
QQA
6.4%

Energy

ISPY
2.6%
QQA
0.5%

Utilities

ISPY
2.2%
QQA
1.2%

Real Estate

ISPY
1.5%
QQA
0.1%

Basic Materials

ISPY
1.5%
QQA
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISPY vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISPY
ISPY Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ISPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISPY Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ISPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISPY Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

QQA
QQA Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
QQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
QQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQA Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISPY vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF (ISPY) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISPYQQADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.33

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.89

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.28

12.35

-3.07

ISPY vs. QQA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISPY Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the QQA Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISPY and QQA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISPY vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISPY drawdown since its inception was -16.88%, smaller than the maximum QQA drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISPY and QQA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISPYQQADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.88%

-19.73%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.43%

-8.76%

+0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.46%

-3.37%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.09%

-2.53%

+0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

2.04%

+0.02%

Volatility

ISPY vs. QQA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF (ISPY) is 4.68%, while Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) has a volatility of 6.79%. This indicates that ISPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISPYQQADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

6.79%

-2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.47%

11.34%

-1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.04%

14.00%

-1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.72%

18.60%

-4.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.72%

18.60%

-4.88%

ISPY vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISPY has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QQA's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISPY vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison

ISPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, less than QQA's 9.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ISPY
ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF
4.54%8.56%9.84%
QQA
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
9.82%9.78%4.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISPY and QQA have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQA has higher volatility (6.79%) compared to ISPY (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISPY dropped -16.88% vs QQA's -19.73%.

On 1-year performance, QQA leads with 25.18% vs 19.08% for ISPY. On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, ISPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQA has performed better with a 25.18% return vs 19.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ISPY.

QQA has the higher dividend yield at 9.82%, compared with 4.54% for ISPY.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ISPY and 0.29% for QQA.

QQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISPY and QQA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer