ISPY vs. QDTE
ISPY (ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF) and QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. ISPY is passively managed, while QDTE is actively managed. Over the past year, ISPY returned 16.35% vs 28.86% for QDTE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ISPY charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for QDTE.
Performance
ISPY vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISPY achieves a 5.30% return, which is significantly lower than QDTE's 12.12% return.
ISPY
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -4.20%
- YTD
- 5.30%
- 6M
- 3.91%
- 1Y
- 16.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDTE
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- YTD
- 12.12%
- 6M
- 10.78%
- 1Y
- 28.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISPY vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ISPY ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF | 5.30% | 13.15% | 15.84% |
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 12.12% | 19.32% | 17.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISPY and QDTE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.90 |
The correlation between ISPY and QDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
ISPY vs. QDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISPY
QDTE
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
ISPY
QDTE
-
Financial Services
ISPY
QDTE
Communication Services
ISPY
QDTE
-
Consumer Cyclical
ISPY
QDTE
-
Healthcare
ISPY
QDTE
-
Industrials
ISPY
QDTE
-
Consumer Defensive
ISPY
QDTE
-
Energy
ISPY
QDTE
-
Utilities
ISPY
QDTE
-
Real Estate
ISPY
QDTE
-
Basic Materials
ISPY
QDTE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISPY vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank
ISPY
QDTE
ISPY vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF (ISPY) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISPY | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.32 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 2.90 | -0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.01 | 11.08 | -3.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISPY vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISPY drawdown since its inception was -16.88%, smaller than the maximum QDTE drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISPY and QDTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISPY | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.88% | -22.86% | +5.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.43% | -10.20% | +1.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.61% | -3.97% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.10% | -3.13% | +1.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 2.66% | -0.57% |
Volatility
ISPY vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF (ISPY) is 4.81%, while Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a volatility of 8.55%. This indicates that ISPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISPY | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 8.55% | -3.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.57% | 13.35% | -3.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.08% | 16.68% | -4.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.73% | 18.97% | -5.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.73% | 18.97% | -5.24% |
ISPY vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISPY has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISPY vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison
ISPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, less than QDTE's 44.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ISPY ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF | 4.59% | 8.56% | 9.84% |
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 44.73% | 49.49% | 32.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISPY and QDTE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QDTE has higher volatility (8.55%) compared to ISPY (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISPY dropped -16.88% vs QDTE's -22.86%.
On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 28.86% vs 16.35% for ISPY. On fees, ISPY is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, ISPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 28.86% return vs 16.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISPY is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for QDTE.
QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 44.73%, compared with 4.59% for ISPY.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ISPY and 0.97% for QDTE.
QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISPY and QDTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer