ISPY.L vs. ICLN
ISPY.L (L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF) and ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISPY.L is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the ISE Cyber Security UCITS Index, while ICLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISPY.L returned 16.69%/yr vs 8.61%/yr for ICLN. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISPY.L charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ICLN.
Performance
ISPY.L vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ISPY.L is traded in GBp, while ICLN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ICLN values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISPY.L achieves a 44.89% return, which is significantly higher than ICLN's 11.03% return. Over the past 10 years, ISPY.L has outperformed ICLN with an annualized return of 16.69%, while ICLN has yielded a comparatively lower 8.61% annualized return.
ISPY.L
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 50.01%
- YTD
- 44.89%
- 1Y
- 41.53%
- 3Y*
- 26.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.45%
- 10Y*
- 16.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.95%
ICLN
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -15.46%
- 6M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 11.03%
- 1Y
- 34.86%
- 3Y*
- -1.04%
- 5Y*
- -2.85%
- 10Y*
- 8.61%
- ALL TIME*
- -1.68%
ISPY.L vs. ICLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISPY.L L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF | 44.89% | 0.28% | 19.68% | 34.35% | -24.57% | 9.18% | 37.24% | 25.65% | 14.46% | 13.11% |
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 11.03% | 36.57% | -24.42% | -24.38% | 5.82% | -23.46% | 134.72% | 38.87% | -3.64% | 10.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISPY.L and ICLN is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2015 | 0.33 |
The correlation between ISPY.L and ICLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ISPY.L vs. ICLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISPY.L
ICLN
Technology
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
ISPY.L
ICLN
Communication Services
ISPY.L
ICLN
-
Industrials
ISPY.L
ICLN
Basic Materials
ISPY.L
-
ICLN
Consumer Cyclical
ISPY.L
-
ICLN
Consumer Defensive
ISPY.L
-
ICLN
-
Energy
ISPY.L
-
ICLN
Financial Services
ISPY.L
-
ICLN
Healthcare
ISPY.L
-
ICLN
-
Real Estate
ISPY.L
-
ICLN
-
Utilities
ISPY.L
-
ICLN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISPY.L vs. ICLN — Risk / Return Rank
ISPY.L
ICLN
ISPY.L vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF (ISPY.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISPY.L | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.21 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 1.51 | +0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.05 | 5.06 | -0.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISPY.L vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISPY.L drawdown since its inception was -50.17%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -84.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISPY.L and ICLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISPY.L | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.17% | -84.40% | +34.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.33% | -23.23% | +2.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.19% | -41.98% | +13.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.77% | -57.04% | +25.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.77% | -64.68% | +32.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.42% | -41.10% | +36.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.85% | -57.47% | +44.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.20% | 6.91% | +1.29% |
Volatility
ISPY.L vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison
L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF (ISPY.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) have volatilities of 10.69% and 11.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISPY.L | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.69% | 11.10% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.88% | 23.27% | +1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.85% | 28.49% | -0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.58% | 26.01% | +1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 26.44% | -1.96% |
ISPY.L vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISPY.L has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than ICLN's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISPY.L vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison
ISPY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.02% | 1.63% | 1.85% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% |
ISPY.L L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISPY.L and ICLN have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICLN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICLN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for ISPY.L.
ISPY.L is categorized as Cybersecurity, while ICLN is Alternative Energy Equities. ISPY.L tracks ISE Cyber Security UCITS Index, while ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: L&G and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for ISPY.L and 0.39% for ICLN.
Find the right allocation for ISPY.L and ICLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer