PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISPY.L vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISPY.L vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF (ISPY.L) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ISPY.L is traded in GBp, while GRID is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GRID values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISPY.L achieves a 44.89% return, which is significantly higher than GRID's 16.60% return. Over the past 10 years, ISPY.L has underperformed GRID with an annualized return of 16.69%, while GRID has yielded a comparatively higher 18.16% annualized return.


ISPY.L

1D
0.85%
1M
11.78%
6M
50.01%
YTD
44.89%
1Y
41.53%
3Y*
26.97%
5Y*
12.45%
10Y*
16.69%
ALL TIME*
11.95%

GRID

1D
-0.28%
1M
-10.20%
6M
11.24%
YTD
16.60%
1Y
25.04%
3Y*
17.77%
5Y*
15.35%
10Y*
18.16%
ALL TIME*
13.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISPY.L vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISPY.L
L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF
44.89%0.28%19.68%34.35%-24.57%9.18%37.24%25.65%14.46%13.11%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
16.60%20.42%17.20%15.50%-3.65%28.86%44.47%37.37%-18.11%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ISPY.L and GRID is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2015

0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between ISPY.L and GRID has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ISPY.L vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISPY.L
GRID

Technology

97.3%
11.6%

Communication Services

2.5%

-

Industrials

0.3%
67.4%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

1.6%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

17.3%

Technology

ISPY.L
97.3%
GRID
11.6%

Communication Services

ISPY.L
2.5%
GRID

-

Industrials

ISPY.L
0.3%
GRID
67.4%

Basic Materials

ISPY.L

-

GRID
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ISPY.L

-

GRID
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

ISPY.L

-

GRID

-

Energy

ISPY.L

-

GRID
1.6%

Financial Services

ISPY.L

-

GRID

-

Healthcare

ISPY.L

-

GRID

-

Real Estate

ISPY.L

-

GRID

-

Utilities

ISPY.L

-

GRID
17.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISPY.L vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISPY.L
ISPY.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ISPY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISPY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISPY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ISPY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISPY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISPY.L vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF (ISPY.L) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISPY.LGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.22

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

2.25

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.05

6.83

-1.78

ISPY.L vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISPY.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISPY.L and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISPY.L vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISPY.L drawdown since its inception was -50.17%, which is greater than GRID's maximum drawdown of -34.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISPY.L and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISPY.LGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.17%

-34.09%

-16.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.33%

-11.18%

-9.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.19%

-22.93%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.77%

-22.93%

-8.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.77%

-34.09%

+2.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.42%

-11.18%

+6.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.85%

-6.97%

-5.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.20%

3.67%

+4.53%

Volatility

ISPY.L vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF (ISPY.L) has a higher volatility of 10.69% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) at 8.38%. This indicates that ISPY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISPY.LGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.69%

8.38%

+2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.88%

17.53%

+7.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.85%

20.26%

+7.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.58%

19.25%

+8.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.48%

21.57%

+2.91%

ISPY.L vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISPY.L has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISPY.L vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

ISPY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.81%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
ISPY.L
L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISPY.L and GRID have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISPY.L is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISPY.L is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

ISPY.L is categorized as Cybersecurity, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. ISPY.L tracks ISE Cyber Security UCITS Index, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: L&G and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for ISPY.L and 0.70% for GRID.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISPY.L and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer