ISNQX vs. IRLNX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ISNQX (Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio) and IRLNX (Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio) are both mutual funds - ISNQX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Voya, while IRLNX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Voya. Over the past 10 years, ISNQX returned 11.42%/yr vs 19.18%/yr for IRLNX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ISNQX charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IRLNX.

Performance

ISNQX vs. IRLNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio (ISNQX) and Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISNQX achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly higher than IRLNX's 7.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ISNQX has underperformed IRLNX with an annualized return of 11.42%, while IRLNX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.18% annualized return.

ISNQX

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 3.91%
• YTD: 11.58%
• 6M: 12.23%
• 1Y: 26.60%
• 3Y*: 19.31%
• 5Y*: 9.60%
• 10Y*: 11.42%

IRLNX

• 1D: -1.41%
• 1M: 5.99%
• YTD: 7.75%
• 6M: 6.99%
• 1Y: 26.66%
• 3Y*: 25.52%
• 5Y*: 16.35%
• 10Y*: 19.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISNQX vs. IRLNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ISNQX Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio	11.58%	20.04%	15.16%	20.86%	-19.16%	17.44%	16.39%	24.65%	-10.36%	22.00%
IRLNX Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio	7.75%	18.20%	34.60%	46.01%	-30.06%	30.63%	38.32%	35.61%	-2.02%	31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between ISNQX and IRLNX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2011	0.86

The correlation between ISNQX and IRLNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ISNQX vs. IRLNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISNQX

ISNQX Risk / Return Rank: 75
ISNQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
ISNQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
ISNQX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
ISNQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
ISNQX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

IRLNX

IRLNX Risk / Return Rank: 34
IRLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
IRLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
IRLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
IRLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
IRLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISNQX vs. IRLNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio (ISNQX) and Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ISNQX	IRLNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	1.88	+0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.55	2.66	+0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.33	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	1.85	+1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.25	5.80	+9.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ISNQX vs. IRLNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISNQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the IRLNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISNQX and IRLNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ISNQX	IRLNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	1.88	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.77	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	0.91	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.93	-0.16

Drawdowns

ISNQX vs. IRLNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISNQX drawdown since its inception was -33.88%, roughly equal to the maximum IRLNX drawdown of -32.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISNQX and IRLNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISNQX	IRLNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.88%	-32.90%	-0.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.38%	-16.64%	+7.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.79%	-23.31%	+7.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.90%	-32.90%	+6.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.88%	-32.90%	-0.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.80%	-1.85%	+1.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.59%	-4.74%	+0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.88%	5.02%	-3.14%

Volatility

ISNQX vs. IRLNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio (ISNQX) is 3.51%, while Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that ISNQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IRLNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISNQX	IRLNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.51%	5.41%	-1.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.78%	12.32%	-2.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.00%	16.30%	-4.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.31%	22.01%	-6.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.31%	21.45%	-5.14%

ISNQX vs. IRLNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISNQX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IRLNX's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISNQX vs. IRLNX - Dividend Comparison

ISNQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.18%, less than IRLNX's 19.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IRLNX Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio	19.16%	9.54%	3.55%	4.60%	11.22%	0.83%	4.18%	4.95%	3.70%	0.99%	1.23%	1.14%
ISNQX Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio	7.18%	8.01%	1.33%	6.04%	31.37%	2.78%	6.32%	8.18%	6.96%	1.98%	1.14%	7.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISNQX and IRLNX in my portfolio?

ISNQX and IRLNX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ISNQX or IRLNX?

IRLNX has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to ISNQX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISNQX dropped -33.88% vs IRLNX's -32.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ISNQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.