PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISMF vs. TLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ISMF vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Managed Futures Active ETF (ISMF) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ISMF vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISMF achieves a 3.84% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's 0.07% return.


ISMF

1D
0.21%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
3.84%
6M
9.64%
1Y
14.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLT

1D
-0.10%
1M
-3.35%
YTD
0.07%
6M
-1.23%
1Y
-1.44%
3Y*
-2.81%
5Y*
-5.87%
10Y*
-1.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ISMF vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISMF has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ISMF vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISMF
ISMF Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ISMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ISMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISMF Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISMF vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Managed Futures Active ETF (ISMF) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISMFTLTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

-0.13

+1.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.44

-0.10

+2.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

0.99

+0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

-0.06

+3.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.89

-0.13

+8.02

ISMF vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISMF Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the TLT Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISMF and TLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISMFTLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

-0.13

+1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.87

0.26

+1.62

Correlation

The correlation between ISMF and TLT is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ISMF vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

ISMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%, more than TLT's 4.53% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISMF
iShares Managed Futures Active ETF
6.00%6.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.53%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Drawdowns

ISMF vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISMF drawdown since its inception was -4.23%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISMF and TLT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ISMFTLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-48.35%

+44.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.23%

-9.23%

+5.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-40.23%

+38.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.41%

-13.62%

+12.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

4.39%

-2.46%

Volatility

ISMF vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Managed Futures Active ETF (ISMF) is 2.90%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 3.71%. This indicates that ISMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ISMFTLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

3.71%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.19%

6.61%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.24%

11.40%

-3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.10%

15.88%

-7.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.10%

14.93%

-6.83%