PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISMD vs. CSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISMD vs. CSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISMD achieves a 21.54% return, which is significantly higher than CSB's 8.30% return.


ISMD

1D
-1.62%
1M
5.36%
YTD
21.54%
6M
20.97%
1Y
36.88%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*

CSB

1D
-1.09%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
8.30%
6M
7.74%
1Y
17.95%
3Y*
11.48%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISMD vs. CSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISMD
Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF
21.54%4.14%9.53%16.74%-13.44%29.38%7.45%24.62%-12.63%8.43%
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
8.30%2.26%9.64%12.60%-13.11%27.04%11.30%21.12%-7.10%12.96%

Correlation

The correlation between ISMD and CSB is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2017

0.88

The correlation between ISMD and CSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISMD vs. CSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISMD
CSB

Industrials

17.7%
8.5%

Technology

17.3%
1.2%

Financial Services

15.2%
26.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
19.0%

Healthcare

9.5%
0.4%

Real Estate

8.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
4.4%

Basic Materials

5.2%
3.4%

Energy

3.3%
11.5%

Utilities

3.3%
22.0%

Communication Services

2.5%
3.6%

Industrials

ISMD
17.7%
CSB
8.5%

Technology

ISMD
17.3%
CSB
1.2%

Financial Services

ISMD
15.2%
CSB
26.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ISMD
11.2%
CSB
19.0%

Healthcare

ISMD
9.5%
CSB
0.4%

Real Estate

ISMD
8.9%
CSB

-

Consumer Defensive

ISMD
6.1%
CSB
4.4%

Basic Materials

ISMD
5.2%
CSB
3.4%

Energy

ISMD
3.3%
CSB
11.5%

Utilities

ISMD
3.3%
CSB
22.0%

Communication Services

ISMD
2.5%
CSB
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISMD vs. CSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISMD
ISMD Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ISMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISMD Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ISMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISMD Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

CSB
CSB Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSB Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSB Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISMD vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISMDCSBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.01

1.25

+0.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.82

1.92

+0.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.22

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

2.51

+1.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.04

7.26

+4.78

ISMD vs. CSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISMD Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the CSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISMD and CSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISMDCSBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

1.25

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.20

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.45

-0.05

Drawdowns

ISMD vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISMD drawdown since its inception was -44.60%, which is greater than CSB's maximum drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISMD and CSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISMDCSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.60%

-42.07%

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.64%

-7.18%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.64%

-21.82%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.64%

-24.49%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-3.12%

+1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.17%

-7.14%

-1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

2.48%

+0.59%

Volatility

ISMD vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison

Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) at 3.59%. This indicates that ISMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISMDCSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

3.59%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.52%

9.19%

+3.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.56%

14.54%

+4.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.87%

18.78%

+2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.74%

21.31%

+2.43%

ISMD vs. CSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISMD has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than CSB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISMD vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison

ISMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than CSB's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.26%3.54%3.12%3.45%3.60%3.11%3.70%3.19%3.45%3.19%2.85%1.57%
ISMD
Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF
0.95%1.21%1.24%1.17%1.28%9.35%0.99%0.88%1.35%2.02%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISMD and CSB have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISMD has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to CSB (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISMD dropped -44.60% vs CSB's -42.07%.

On 5-year performance, ISMD leads with 7.62% vs 3.65% for CSB. On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ISMD has performed better with a 7.62% return vs 3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for ISMD.

CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.95% for ISMD.

ISMD tracks Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact Equal Weight Index, while CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for ISMD and 0.35% for CSB.

ISMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISMD and CSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer