ISLN.L vs. BABA
ISLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, ISLN.L returned 14.26%/yr vs 4.42%/yr for BABA. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ISLN.L vs. BABA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISLN.L achieves a -5.58% return, which is significantly higher than BABA's -22.32% return. Over the past 10 years, ISLN.L has outperformed BABA with an annualized return of 14.26%, while BABA has yielded a comparatively lower 4.42% annualized return.
ISLN.L
- 1D
- 5.80%
- 1M
- -20.59%
- YTD
- -5.58%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 86.37%
- 3Y*
- 41.38%
- 5Y*
- 19.06%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
BABA
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -19.32%
- YTD
- -22.32%
- 6M
- -26.87%
- 1Y
- 0.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- -10.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.42%
ISLN.L vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | -5.58% | 147.62% | 21.10% | -0.76% | 3.39% | -12.85% | 45.85% | 16.36% | -8.76% | 3.66% |
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -22.32% | 75.80% | 11.77% | -10.83% | -25.84% | -48.96% | 9.73% | 54.74% | -20.51% | 96.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISLN.L and BABA is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2014 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISLN.L vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank
ISLN.L
BABA
ISLN.L vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISLN.L | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.03 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | -0.06 | +2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.36 | -0.12 | +4.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISLN.L vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISLN.L drawdown since its inception was -76.69%, roughly equal to the maximum BABA drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISLN.L and BABA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISLN.L | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.69% | -80.09% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.83% | -39.94% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.83% | -39.94% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.83% | -72.48% | +28.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.83% | -80.09% | +36.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.57% | -62.20% | +21.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.73% | -37.56% | -16.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.70% | 19.58% | +0.12% |
Volatility
ISLN.L vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) has a higher volatility of 15.90% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) at 10.07%. This indicates that ISLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISLN.L | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.90% | 10.07% | +5.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.92% | 29.24% | +25.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.77% | 43.83% | +13.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.79% | 51.40% | -15.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.08% | 43.40% | -12.32% |
Dividends
ISLN.L vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison
ISLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 0.93% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% |
ISLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISLN.L and BABA have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ISLN.L and BABA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer