ISHP vs. IBID
ISHP (First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISHP is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ISHP returned -15.09% vs 4.00% for IBID. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISHP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.
Performance
ISHP vs. IBID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISHP achieves a -15.71% return, which is significantly lower than IBID's 1.94% return.
ISHP
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- -15.71%
- 6M
- -15.87%
- 1Y
- -15.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.02%
- 5Y*
- 0.64%
- 10Y*
- —
IBID
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISHP vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | -15.71% | 12.27% | 24.17% | 7.24% |
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 1.94% | 5.66% | 4.71% | 2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISHP and IBID is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | 0.01 |
The correlation between ISHP and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISHP vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank
ISHP
IBID
ISHP vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISHP | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.74 | -0.87 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 7.30 | -7.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 28.77 | -29.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISHP vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISHP drawdown since its inception was -47.57%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISHP and IBID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISHP | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.57% | -1.28% | -46.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.75% | -0.55% | -24.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.57% | -0.55% | -22.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.70% | -0.22% | -12.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.48% | 0.14% | +12.34% |
Volatility
ISHP vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison
First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that ISHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISHP | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 0.35% | +5.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.14% | 0.86% | +13.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.63% | 1.23% | +16.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.26% | 2.24% | +25.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.08% | 2.24% | +21.84% |
ISHP vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISHP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISHP vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison
ISHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than IBID's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 3.68% | 4.43% | 4.24% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | 1.59% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 1.58% | 0.76% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.16% | 0.89% | 1.65% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISHP and IBID have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISHP has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISHP dropped -47.57% vs IBID's -1.28%.
On 1-year performance, IBID leads with 4.00% vs -15.09% for ISHP. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBID has performed better with a 4.00% return vs -15.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISHP.
IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.59% for ISHP.
ISHP is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. ISHP tracks S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, while IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ISHP and 0.10% for IBID.
IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISHP and IBID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer