ISF.L vs. BLDG
ISF.L (iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist)) and BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISF.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while BLDG is a REIT fund actively managed by Cambria. ISF.L is passively managed, while BLDG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISF.L returned 11.88%/yr vs 3.87%/yr for BLDG. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISF.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BLDG.
Performance
ISF.L vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ISF.L is traded in GBp, while BLDG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BLDG values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISF.L achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly lower than BLDG's 12.38% return.
ISF.L
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 7.07%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 21.68%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
BLDG
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 12.38%
- 6M
- 11.98%
- 1Y
- 15.94%
- 3Y*
- 8.13%
- 5Y*
- 3.87%
- 10Y*
- —
ISF.L vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISF.L iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) | 7.07% | 25.97% | 9.28% | 7.81% | 4.83% | 17.68% | 10.62% |
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 12.38% | -3.16% | 10.07% | -3.32% | -4.52% | 23.63% | 7.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISF.L and BLDG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISF.L vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank
ISF.L
BLDG
ISF.L vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISF.L | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.23 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 1.77 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.89 | 5.88 | +2.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISF.L vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISF.L drawdown since its inception was -45.00%, which is greater than BLDG's maximum drawdown of -22.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISF.L and BLDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISF.L | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.00% | -22.01% | -22.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -8.44% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.69% | -18.44% | +5.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.69% | -22.01% | +9.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.05% | 0.00% | -3.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.45% | -7.71% | +1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 2.53% | +0.15% |
Volatility
ISF.L vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) at 3.31%. This indicates that ISF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISF.L | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 3.31% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.53% | 8.38% | +1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.94% | 10.75% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.59% | 13.90% | -1.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 14.23% | +0.61% |
ISF.L vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISF.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISF.L vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison
ISF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than BLDG's 5.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.42% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 4.99% | 3.99% | 10.40% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISF.L iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) | 1.71% | 3.01% | 3.71% | 3.86% | 3.75% | 3.76% | 3.11% | 4.47% | 4.44% | 3.96% | 3.79% | 4.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISF.L and BLDG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISF.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISF.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BLDG.
ISF.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while BLDG is REIT. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ISF.L and 0.59% for BLDG.
Find the right allocation for ISF.L and BLDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer