ISF.L vs. VUKE.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) and Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF Distributing (VUKE.L).
ISF.L and VUKE.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ISF.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. It was launched on Apr 27, 2000. VUKE.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. It was launched on May 22, 2012. Both ISF.L and VUKE.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ISF.L or VUKE.L.
Key characteristics
| ISF.L | VUKE.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.66% | 9.92% |
| 1Y Return | 11.62% | 11.69% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.70% | 9.68% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.96% | 6.00% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 5.76% | 5.71% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.06 | 1.06 |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.94% | 10.05% |
| Max Drawdown | -68.40% | -34.27% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.49% | -1.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISF.L and VUKE.L is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ISF.L vs. VUKE.L - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ISF.L having a 9.66% return and VUKE.L slightly higher at 9.92%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ISF.L having a 5.76% annualized return and VUKE.L not far behind at 5.71%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ISF.L vs. VUKE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISF.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VUKE.L's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ISF.L vs. VUKE.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) and Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF Distributing (VUKE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ISF.L vs. VUKE.L - Dividend Comparison
ISF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, more than VUKE.L's 3.72% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISF.L iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) | 3.80% | 3.86% | 3.75% | 3.76% | 3.11% | 4.47% | 4.44% | 3.96% | 3.79% | 4.12% | 3.41% | 3.29% |
VUKE.L Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF Distributing | 3.72% | 3.82% | 3.94% | 3.90% | 3.02% | 4.65% | 4.64% | 3.99% | 3.75% | 4.25% | 6.86% | 3.46% |
Drawdowns
ISF.L vs. VUKE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISF.L drawdown since its inception was -68.40%, which is greater than VUKE.L's maximum drawdown of -34.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISF.L and VUKE.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ISF.L vs. VUKE.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) and Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF Distributing (VUKE.L) have volatilities of 3.59% and 3.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.