PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISDE.L vs. IGLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISDE.L vs. IGLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISDE.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISDE.L achieves a 60.11% return, which is significantly higher than IGLN.L's 3.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ISDE.L having a 13.09% annualized return and IGLN.L not far ahead at 13.42%.


ISDE.L

1D
-2.79%
1M
13.41%
YTD
60.11%
6M
64.90%
1Y
107.18%
3Y*
32.29%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
13.09%

IGLN.L

1D
0.68%
1M
-2.35%
YTD
3.70%
6M
6.03%
1Y
32.37%
3Y*
31.55%
5Y*
18.61%
10Y*
13.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISDE.L vs. IGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISDE.L
iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
60.11%40.46%-3.55%13.97%-22.72%2.64%22.21%19.39%-17.27%41.72%
IGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
3.70%64.92%26.14%13.44%-0.09%-4.03%24.16%18.28%-1.31%11.67%

Correlation

The correlation between ISDE.L and IGLN.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2011

0.17

The correlation between ISDE.L and IGLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISDE.L vs. IGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISDE.L
ISDE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ISDE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISDE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISDE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ISDE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISDE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLN.L
IGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISDE.L vs. IGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISDE.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISDE.LIGLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

1.25

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.48

1.86

+5.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.54

4.79

+23.75

ISDE.L vs. IGLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISDE.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.28, which is higher than the IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISDE.L and IGLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISDE.LIGLN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.28

1.30

+2.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

1.07

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.86

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.46

-0.22

Drawdowns

ISDE.L vs. IGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISDE.L drawdown since its inception was -59.96%, which is greater than IGLN.L's maximum drawdown of -45.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISDE.L and IGLN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISDE.LIGLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.96%

-45.24%

-14.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.25%

-17.36%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.81%

-17.36%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.28%

-21.15%

-11.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.67%

-21.15%

-15.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.68%

-15.66%

+11.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.89%

-19.80%

-2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.74%

6.74%

-3.00%

Volatility

ISDE.L vs. IGLN.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISDE.L) has a higher volatility of 12.14% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) at 6.36%. This indicates that ISDE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISDE.LIGLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.14%

6.36%

+5.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.26%

21.73%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.94%

24.78%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.26%

17.36%

+1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.87%

15.54%

+4.33%

ISDE.L vs. IGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISDE.L has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IGLN.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISDE.L vs. IGLN.L - Dividend Comparison

ISDE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while IGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISDE.L
iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.08%1.86%2.51%2.77%2.10%1.79%0.98%1.55%1.64%1.02%1.07%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISDE.L and IGLN.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IGLN.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ISDE.L.

ISDE.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IGLN.L is Gold. ISDE.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Islamic Index, while IGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for ISDE.L and 0.25% for IGLN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISDE.L and IGLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer