PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ISDE.L vs. LEML.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ISDE.L vs. LEML.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ISDE.L (iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and LEML.L (Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - ISDE.L tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Islamic Index while LEML.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISDE.L returned 13.62%/yr vs 10.09%/yr for LEML.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ISDE.L charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for LEML.L.

Performance

ISDE.L vs. LEML.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISDE.L) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD (LEML.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ISDE.L is traded in USD, while LEML.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LEML.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISDE.L achieves a 64.70% return, which is significantly higher than LEML.L's 27.67% return. Over the past 10 years, ISDE.L has outperformed LEML.L with an annualized return of 13.62%, while LEML.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.09% annualized return.

ISDE.L

1D
-0.92%
1M
21.92%
YTD
64.70%
6M
71.02%
1Y
115.62%
3Y*
33.09%
5Y*
13.46%
10Y*
13.62%

LEML.L

1D
-1.13%
1M
7.17%
YTD
27.67%
6M
31.11%
1Y
54.38%
3Y*
24.13%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
10.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISDE.L vs. LEML.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISDE.L
iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		64.70%40.46%-3.55%13.97%-22.72%2.64%22.21%19.39%-17.27%41.72%
LEML.L
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD		27.67%34.01%6.90%8.09%-20.23%-2.81%17.05%17.56%-15.07%36.46%

Correlation

The correlation between ISDE.L and LEML.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2012

0.87

The correlation between ISDE.L and LEML.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISDE.L vs. LEML.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ISDE.L
LEML.L

Technology

48.0%
36.9%

Basic Materials

12.2%
6.6%

Energy

10.1%
4.1%

Industrials

8.6%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
9.6%

Healthcare

4.8%
2.9%

Financial Services

3.7%
19.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
3.0%

Utilities

2.3%
2.1%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.0%

Communication Services

0.9%
6.9%

Technology

ISDE.L
48.0%
LEML.L
36.9%

Basic Materials

ISDE.L
12.2%
LEML.L
6.6%

Energy

ISDE.L
10.1%
LEML.L
4.1%

Industrials

ISDE.L
8.6%
LEML.L
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ISDE.L
5.3%
LEML.L
9.6%

Healthcare

ISDE.L
4.8%
LEML.L
2.9%

Financial Services

ISDE.L
3.7%
LEML.L
19.5%

Consumer Defensive

ISDE.L
3.3%
LEML.L
3.0%

Utilities

ISDE.L
2.3%
LEML.L
2.1%

Real Estate

ISDE.L
0.9%
LEML.L
1.0%

Communication Services

ISDE.L
0.9%
LEML.L
6.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD

Often compared with ISDE.L:
ISDE.L vs. JRDM.LISDE.L vs. VDEM.LISDE.L vs. VFEG.LISDE.L vs. PRAM.LISDE.L vs. EDG2.LISDE.L vs. IUIT.LISDE.L vs. VFEM.L
Often compared with LEML.L:
LEML.L vs. MWRD.LLEML.L vs. PACW.LLEML.L vs. SEDY.LLEML.L vs. ANXU.LLEML.L vs. E127.LLEML.L vs. 100D.LLEML.L vs. ACWL.L

Return for Risk

ISDE.L vs. LEML.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ISDE.L
ISDE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ISDE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISDE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISDE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ISDE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISDE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
LEML.L
LEML.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
LEML.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEML.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEML.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LEML.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEML.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISDE.L vs. LEML.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISDE.L) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD (LEML.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ISDE.LLEML.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
4.65
2.99

+1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
5.27
3.91

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.79

1.53

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.07

4.26

+3.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

30.85

15.78

+15.06

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ISDE.L vs. LEML.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISDE.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.65, which is higher than the LEML.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISDE.L and LEML.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ISDE.LLEML.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.65

2.99

+1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.40

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.52

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.33

-0.09

Drawdowns

ISDE.L vs. LEML.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISDE.L drawdown since its inception was -59.96%, which is greater than LEML.L's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISDE.L and LEML.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ISDE.LLEML.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.96%

-40.14%

-19.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.25%

-13.12%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.81%

-16.83%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.28%

-37.32%

+5.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.67%

-40.14%

+3.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-1.13%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.90%

-14.64%

-7.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

3.55%

+0.18%

Volatility

ISDE.L vs. LEML.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISDE.L) has a higher volatility of 12.15% compared to Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD (LEML.L) at 8.09%. This indicates that ISDE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LEML.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ISDE.LLEML.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.15%

8.09%

+4.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.03%

16.02%

+6.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.75%

18.73%

+6.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.22%

18.60%

+0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.86%

19.40%

+0.46%

ISDE.L vs. LEML.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISDE.L has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than LEML.L's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISDE.L vs. LEML.L - Dividend Comparison

ISDE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while LEML.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISDE.L
iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		1.05%1.86%2.51%2.77%2.10%1.79%0.98%1.55%1.64%1.02%1.07%2.32%
LEML.L
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

ISDE.L and LEML.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LEML.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LEML.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ISDE.L.

ISDE.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Islamic Index, while LEML.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for ISDE.L and 0.55% for LEML.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISDE.L and LEML.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer