PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISCV vs. SVAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISCV vs. SVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) and iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCV achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than SVAL's 15.99% return.


ISCV

1D
-0.57%
1M
2.04%
YTD
10.08%
6M
10.27%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*
8.58%

SVAL

1D
-1.51%
1M
2.08%
YTD
15.99%
6M
15.39%
1Y
34.88%
3Y*
17.30%
5Y*
6.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCV vs. SVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ISCV
iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF
10.08%10.38%9.31%16.55%-10.58%29.15%28.61%
SVAL
iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF
15.99%8.23%7.54%12.27%-10.15%33.18%27.93%

Correlation

The correlation between ISCV and SVAL is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2020

0.95

The correlation between ISCV and SVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISCV vs. SVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISCV
SVAL

Financial Services

21.1%
23.7%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
13.7%

Industrials

12.1%
15.8%

Healthcare

11.1%
10.3%

Real Estate

11.0%
2.7%

Technology

8.9%
10.7%

Energy

7.2%
7.7%

Basic Materials

5.8%
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
4.1%

Utilities

3.6%
3.3%

Communication Services

1.8%
1.8%

Financial Services

ISCV
21.1%
SVAL
23.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ISCV
13.4%
SVAL
13.7%

Industrials

ISCV
12.1%
SVAL
15.8%

Healthcare

ISCV
11.1%
SVAL
10.3%

Real Estate

ISCV
11.0%
SVAL
2.7%

Technology

ISCV
8.9%
SVAL
10.7%

Energy

ISCV
7.2%
SVAL
7.7%

Basic Materials

ISCV
5.8%
SVAL
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

ISCV
3.7%
SVAL
4.1%

Utilities

ISCV
3.6%
SVAL
3.3%

Communication Services

ISCV
1.8%
SVAL
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISCV vs. SVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCV
ISCV Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ISCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCV Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCV Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

SVAL
SVAL Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCV vs. SVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) and iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISCVSVALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.35

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

3.92

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.55

12.29

-1.74

ISCV vs. SVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCV Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the SVAL Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCV and SVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISCVSVALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

1.97

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.29

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.70

-0.34

Drawdowns

ISCV vs. SVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCV drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, which is greater than SVAL's maximum drawdown of -27.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCV and SVAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISCVSVALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.14%

-27.44%

-35.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.25%

-8.94%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.35%

-27.44%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.35%

-27.44%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-1.51%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.14%

-8.51%

-0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.85%

-0.19%

Volatility

ISCV vs. SVAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) is 3.80%, while iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that ISCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISCVSVALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

4.31%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

11.62%

-1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.28%

17.87%

-1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.83%

22.33%

-1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.30%

23.27%

+0.03%

ISCV vs. SVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SVAL's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ISCV vs. SVAL - Dividend Comparison

ISCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than SVAL's 2.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISCV
iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF
1.88%2.04%2.01%2.21%2.12%1.95%2.01%2.36%2.48%1.74%2.49%2.60%
SVAL
iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF
2.27%2.33%1.82%2.25%2.09%2.33%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ISCV and SVAL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SVAL has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to ISCV (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCV dropped -63.14% vs SVAL's -27.44%.

On 5-year performance, ISCV leads with 6.54% vs 6.47% for SVAL. On fees, ISCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ISCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ISCV has performed better with a 6.54% return vs 6.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SVAL.

SVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 1.88% for ISCV.

ISCV tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Value Extended Index, while SVAL tracks Russell 2000 Focused Value Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for ISCV and 0.20% for SVAL.

SVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISCV and SVAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer