ISCV vs. SMIG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ISCV (iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF) and SMIG (Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. ISCV is passively managed, while SMIG is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ISCV returned 15.48%/yr vs 13.09%/yr for SMIG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ISCV charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SMIG.

Performance

ISCV vs. SMIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) and Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ISCV having a 10.08% return and SMIG slightly higher at 10.18%.

ISCV

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 2.04%
• YTD: 10.08%
• 6M: 10.27%
• 1Y: 27.98%
• 3Y*: 15.48%
• 5Y*: 6.54%
• 10Y*: 8.58%

SMIG

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 10.18%
• 6M: 11.46%
• 1Y: 11.81%
• 3Y*: 13.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCV vs. SMIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ISCV iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF	10.08%	10.38%	9.31%	16.55%	-10.58%	5.66%
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF	10.18%	0.78%	17.63%	13.62%	-11.83%	5.51%

Correlation

The correlation between ISCV and SMIG is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021	0.90

The correlation between ISCV and SMIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISCV vs. SMIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ISCV	SMIG
Financial Services	21.1%	14.2%
Consumer Cyclical	13.4%	17.2%
Industrials	12.1%	13.9%
Healthcare	11.1%	10.1%
Real Estate	11.0%	6.9%
Technology	8.9%	19.8%
Energy	7.2%	12.8%
Basic Materials	5.8%	7.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	2.4%
Utilities	3.6%	5.4%
Communication Services	1.8%	2.2%

Return for Risk

ISCV vs. SMIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCV

ISCV Risk / Return Rank: 54
ISCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
ISCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
ISCV Omega Ratio Rank: 47
ISCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
ISCV Martin Ratio Rank: 59

SMIG

SMIG Risk / Return Rank: 27
SMIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
SMIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
SMIG Omega Ratio Rank: 26
SMIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
SMIG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCV vs. SMIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) and Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ISCV	SMIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	0.99	+0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	1.53	+1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.18	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	1.39	+1.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.55	3.62	+6.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ISCV vs. SMIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCV Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the SMIG Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCV and SMIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ISCV	SMIG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	0.99	+0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.43	-0.07

Drawdowns

ISCV vs. SMIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCV drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, which is greater than SMIG's maximum drawdown of -19.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCV and SMIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISCV	SMIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.14%	-19.65%	-43.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.25%	-8.52%	-0.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.35%	-19.23%	-6.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-1.79%	+1.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.14%	-6.55%	-2.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	3.27%	-0.61%

Volatility

ISCV vs. SMIG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) and Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) have volatilities of 3.80% and 3.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISCV	SMIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.80%	3.65%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.45%	8.43%	+2.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.28%	11.98%	+4.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.83%	16.20%	+4.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.30%	16.20%	+7.10%

ISCV vs. SMIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SMIG's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISCV vs. SMIG - Dividend Comparison

ISCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than SMIG's 1.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ISCV iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF	1.88%	2.04%	2.01%	2.21%	2.12%	1.95%	2.01%	2.36%	2.48%	1.74%	2.49%	2.60%
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF	1.75%	1.82%	1.75%	1.91%	2.00%	0.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISCV and SMIG in my portfolio?

ISCV and SMIG have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ISCV or SMIG?

ISCV has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to SMIG (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCV dropped -63.14% vs SMIG's -19.65%.

Which ETF is better, ISCV or SMIG?

On 3-year performance, ISCV leads with 15.48% vs 13.09% for SMIG. On fees, ISCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SMIG has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ISCV or SMIG?

Over the 3-year period, ISCV has performed better with a 15.48% return vs 13.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ISCV or SMIG?

ISCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SMIG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ISCV or SMIG?

ISCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 1.75% for SMIG.

What is the main difference between ISCV and SMIG?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Bahl & Gaynor. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for ISCV and 0.60% for SMIG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ISCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.