PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISCV vs. IJR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISCV vs. IJR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCV achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than IJR's 15.38% return. Over the past 10 years, ISCV has underperformed IJR with an annualized return of 8.58%, while IJR has yielded a comparatively higher 10.66% annualized return.


ISCV

1D
-0.57%
1M
2.04%
YTD
10.08%
6M
10.27%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*
8.58%

IJR

1D
-0.89%
1M
1.67%
YTD
15.38%
6M
14.25%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
10.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCV vs. IJR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISCV
iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF
10.08%10.38%9.31%16.55%-10.58%29.15%0.86%19.51%-17.39%8.59%
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
15.38%5.89%8.63%16.06%-16.20%26.58%11.28%22.82%-8.51%13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between ISCV and IJR is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2004

0.95

The correlation between ISCV and IJR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISCV vs. IJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISCV
IJR

Financial Services

21.1%
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
13.4%

Industrials

12.1%
15.5%

Healthcare

11.1%
11.1%

Real Estate

11.0%
7.6%

Technology

8.9%
15.5%

Energy

7.2%
5.9%

Basic Materials

5.8%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
3.5%

Utilities

3.6%
2.0%

Communication Services

1.8%
3.6%

Financial Services

ISCV
21.1%
IJR
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ISCV
13.4%
IJR
13.4%

Industrials

ISCV
12.1%
IJR
15.5%

Healthcare

ISCV
11.1%
IJR
11.1%

Real Estate

ISCV
11.0%
IJR
7.6%

Technology

ISCV
8.9%
IJR
15.5%

Energy

ISCV
7.2%
IJR
5.9%

Basic Materials

ISCV
5.8%
IJR
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

ISCV
3.7%
IJR
3.5%

Utilities

ISCV
3.6%
IJR
2.0%

Communication Services

ISCV
1.8%
IJR
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISCV vs. IJR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCV
ISCV Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ISCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCV Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCV Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

IJR
IJR Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJR Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCV vs. IJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISCVIJRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

3.65

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.55

12.14

-1.59

ISCV vs. IJR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCV Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the IJR Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCV and IJR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISCVIJRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

1.81

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.26

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.47

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.43

-0.07

Drawdowns

ISCV vs. IJR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCV drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, which is greater than IJR's maximum drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCV and IJR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISCVIJRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.14%

-58.15%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.25%

-8.68%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.35%

-28.02%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.35%

-28.02%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.56%

-44.36%

-7.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-0.91%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.14%

-9.28%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.60%

+0.06%

Volatility

ISCV vs. IJR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) is 3.80%, while iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that ISCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISCVIJRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

4.45%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

11.65%

-1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.28%

17.54%

-1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.83%

21.41%

-0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.30%

22.91%

+0.39%

ISCV vs. IJR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ISCV and IJR have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ISCV vs. IJR - Dividend Comparison

ISCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than IJR's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
1.15%1.44%2.05%1.31%1.41%1.53%1.11%1.44%1.58%1.20%1.22%1.48%
ISCV
iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF
1.88%2.04%2.01%2.21%2.12%1.95%2.01%2.36%2.48%1.74%2.49%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, ISCV and IJR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IJR has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to ISCV (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCV dropped -63.14% vs IJR's -58.15%.

On 10-year performance, IJR leads with 10.66% vs 8.58% for ISCV. Both ETFs have the same 0.06% expense ratio. On volatility, ISCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IJR has performed better with a 10.66% return vs 8.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCV and IJR have the same expense ratio: 0.06% per year.

ISCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 1.15% for IJR.

ISCV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while IJR is Small Cap Blend Equities. ISCV tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Value Extended Index, while IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index.

IJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISCV and IJR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer