ISCV vs. BSVO
ISCV (iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF) and BSVO (EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. ISCV is passively managed, while BSVO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ISCV returned 15.48%/yr vs 18.56%/yr for BSVO. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ISCV charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for BSVO.
Performance
ISCV vs. BSVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISCV achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than BSVO's 18.09% return.
ISCV
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- 8.58%
BSVO
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 18.09%
- 6M
- 17.20%
- 1Y
- 41.30%
- 3Y*
- 18.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCV vs. BSVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCV iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF | 10.08% | 10.38% | 9.31% | 19.11% |
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | 18.09% | 9.21% | 4.68% | 22.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISCV and BSVO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2023 | 0.95 |
The correlation between ISCV and BSVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
ISCV vs. BSVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISCV
BSVO
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Financial Services
ISCV
BSVO
Consumer Cyclical
ISCV
BSVO
Industrials
ISCV
BSVO
Healthcare
ISCV
BSVO
Real Estate
ISCV
BSVO
Technology
ISCV
BSVO
Energy
ISCV
BSVO
Basic Materials
ISCV
BSVO
Consumer Defensive
ISCV
BSVO
Utilities
ISCV
BSVO
-
Communication Services
ISCV
BSVO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISCV vs. BSVO — Risk / Return Rank
ISCV
BSVO
ISCV vs. BSVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) and EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISCV | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.38 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 4.99 | -1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.55 | 14.22 | -3.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISCV | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 2.21 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.78 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
ISCV vs. BSVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISCV drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, which is greater than BSVO's maximum drawdown of -28.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCV and BSVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISCV | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.14% | -28.67% | -34.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.25% | -8.31% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.35% | -28.67% | +3.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -1.86% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.14% | -5.73% | -3.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 2.91% | -0.25% |
Volatility
ISCV vs. BSVO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) is 3.80%, while EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that ISCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISCV | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 4.77% | -0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.45% | 11.95% | -1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.28% | 18.88% | -2.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 21.72% | -0.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.30% | 21.72% | +1.58% |
ISCV vs. BSVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than BSVO's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISCV vs. BSVO - Dividend Comparison
ISCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than BSVO's 1.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.29% | 1.52% | 1.61% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISCV iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF | 1.88% | 2.04% | 2.01% | 2.21% | 2.12% | 1.95% | 2.01% | 2.36% | 2.48% | 1.74% | 2.49% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, ISCV and BSVO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BSVO has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to ISCV (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCV dropped -63.14% vs BSVO's -28.67%.
On 3-year performance, BSVO leads with 18.56% vs 15.48% for ISCV. On fees, ISCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ISCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BSVO has performed better with a 18.56% return vs 15.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for BSVO.
ISCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 1.29% for BSVO.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Bridgeway. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for ISCV and 0.47% for BSVO.
BSVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISCV and BSVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer