PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISCMF vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ISCMF vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ISCMF vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ISCMF
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
17.84%19.65%3.54%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-22.62%-6.41%99.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCMF achieves a 17.84% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -22.62% return.


ISCMF

1D
0.00%
1M
7.22%
YTD
17.84%
6M
26.76%
1Y
29.86%
3Y*
12.27%
5Y*
10Y*

IBIT

1D
1.96%
1M
3.31%
YTD
-22.62%
6M
-40.89%
1Y
-17.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ISCMF vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCMF has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

ISCMF vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCMF
ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCMF vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISCMFIBITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.79

-0.40

+2.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.44

-0.29

+3.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.36

0.97

+1.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.25

-0.39

+5.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.38

-0.83

+13.21

ISCMF vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCMF Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCMF and IBIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISCMFIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

-0.40

+2.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.35

+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between ISCMF and IBIT is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ISCMF vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

Neither ISCMF nor IBIT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ISCMF vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCMF drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCMF and IBIT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ISCMFIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.42%

-49.36%

+23.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.69%

-49.36%

+43.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

-46.11%

+43.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.98%

-14.13%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

23.09%

-20.68%

Volatility

ISCMF vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) is 9.72%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.99%. This indicates that ISCMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ISCMFIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.72%

12.99%

-3.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.85%

36.75%

-22.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.72%

45.42%

-28.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.05%

51.26%

-37.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.05%

51.26%

-37.21%