PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISCF vs. SCHC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISCF vs. SCHC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCF achieves a 5.98% return, which is significantly higher than SCHC's 5.24% return. Over the past 10 years, ISCF has outperformed SCHC with an annualized return of 10.05%, while SCHC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.67% annualized return.


ISCF

1D
0.61%
1M
-2.85%
YTD
5.98%
6M
5.52%
1Y
18.45%
3Y*
17.34%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*
10.05%

SCHC

1D
0.06%
1M
-6.25%
YTD
5.24%
6M
4.81%
1Y
19.49%
3Y*
16.94%
5Y*
5.71%
10Y*
8.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCF vs. SCHC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISCF
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
5.98%33.65%4.75%11.50%-15.07%13.31%7.65%26.32%-18.76%38.13%
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
5.24%37.59%1.97%14.36%-21.74%12.02%10.48%23.10%-18.60%29.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ISCF and SCHC is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2015

0.88

The correlation between ISCF and SCHC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISCF vs. SCHC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISCF
SCHC

Industrials

23.8%
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
7.4%

Financial Services

12.1%
13.1%

Basic Materials

11.6%
11.7%

Technology

10.8%
6.7%

Real Estate

8.5%
5.0%

Healthcare

5.3%
3.7%

Energy

4.6%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
3.1%

Communication Services

3.7%
2.2%

Utilities

3.5%
2.2%

Industrials

ISCF
23.8%
SCHC
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ISCF
12.4%
SCHC
7.4%

Financial Services

ISCF
12.1%
SCHC
13.1%

Basic Materials

ISCF
11.6%
SCHC
11.7%

Technology

ISCF
10.8%
SCHC
6.7%

Real Estate

ISCF
8.5%
SCHC
5.0%

Healthcare

ISCF
5.3%
SCHC
3.7%

Energy

ISCF
4.6%
SCHC
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

ISCF
3.9%
SCHC
3.1%

Communication Services

ISCF
3.7%
SCHC
2.2%

Utilities

ISCF
3.5%
SCHC
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISCF vs. SCHC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCF
ISCF Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
ISCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCF Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCF Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHC
SCHC Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SCHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHC Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHC Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCF vs. SCHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISCFSCHCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.22

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

1.57

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.93

5.59

+0.34

ISCF vs. SCHC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the SCHC Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCF and SCHC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISCF vs. SCHC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCF drawdown since its inception was -40.79%, smaller than the maximum SCHC drawdown of -43.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCF and SCHC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISCFSCHCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.79%

-43.94%

+3.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.34%

-12.48%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.85%

-15.52%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.70%

-36.48%

+5.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.79%

-43.94%

+3.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.82%

-7.03%

+3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.11%

-10.03%

+1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

3.50%

-0.38%

Volatility

ISCF vs. SCHC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) is 4.86%, while Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that ISCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISCFSCHCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

5.94%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.56%

14.12%

-1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.87%

16.33%

-1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

17.64%

-0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.42%

17.85%

-0.43%

ISCF vs. SCHC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHC's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISCF vs. SCHC - Dividend Comparison

ISCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than SCHC's 3.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISCF
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
3.74%3.76%4.29%3.94%2.73%3.93%2.30%2.87%2.14%1.97%2.89%1.46%
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
3.52%3.66%3.72%2.94%1.78%3.02%1.62%3.23%2.51%2.73%2.01%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, ISCF and SCHC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHC has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to ISCF (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCF dropped -40.79% vs SCHC's -43.94%.

On 10-year performance, ISCF leads with 10.05% vs 8.67% for SCHC. On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, ISCF has been the lower-risk option at 4.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ISCF has performed better with a 10.05% return vs 8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ISCF.

ISCF has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 3.52% for SCHC.

ISCF tracks MSCI World exUSA SmallCap Diversified Multi-Factor, while SCHC tracks FTSE Developed Small Cap ex U.S. Liquid Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ISCF and 0.08% for SCHC.

ISCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISCF and SCHC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer