PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISBG vs. ZCSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISBG vs. ZCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF (ISBG) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ISBG

1D
-7.86%
1M
-21.14%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZCSH

1D
15.08%
1M
75.10%
YTD
49.20%
6M
98.43%
1Y
1,084.60%
3Y*
191.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISBG vs. ZCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ISBG and ZCSH is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISBG vs. ZCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISBG

ZCSH
ZCSH Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ZCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISBG vs. ZCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF (ISBG) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ISBG vs. ZCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISBGZCSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.88

0.11

-0.99

Drawdowns

ISBG vs. ZCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISBG drawdown since its inception was -38.42%, smaller than the maximum ZCSH drawdown of -93.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISBG and ZCSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISBGZCSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.42%

-93.73%

+55.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.42%

-11.00%

-27.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.08%

-74.46%

+51.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.47%

Volatility

ISBG vs. ZCSH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISBGZCSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

48.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

98.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.53%

165.89%

-90.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.53%

136.90%

-61.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.53%

136.90%

-61.37%

ISBG vs. ZCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISBG has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is lower than ZCSH's 2.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISBG vs. ZCSH - Dividend Comparison

ISBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.94%, while ZCSH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


ISBG and ZCSH have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISBG is cheaper at 1.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISBG is cheaper with a 1.14% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.

ISBG has the higher dividend yield at 8.94%, compared with 0.00% for ZCSH.

They also come from different issuers: Quantify Funds and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for ISBG and 2.50% for ZCSH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISBG and ZCSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer