PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISBG vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISBG vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF (ISBG) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ISBG

1D
-11.39%
1M
-40.38%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLD

1D
-3.65%
1M
-8.06%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
2.54%
1Y
28.10%
3Y*
29.53%
5Y*
17.47%
10Y*
12.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISBG vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ISBG and GLD is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026

0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISBG vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISBG

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISBG vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF (ISBG) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ISBG vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISBGGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.04

0.59

-1.63

Drawdowns

ISBG vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISBG drawdown since its inception was -49.42%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISBG and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISBGGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.42%

-45.56%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.42%

-20.10%

-29.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.77%

-16.16%

-7.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.91%

Volatility

ISBG vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISBGGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.91%

26.86%

+50.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

76.91%

18.07%

+58.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

76.91%

16.00%

+60.91%

ISBG vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISBG has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISBG vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

ISBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.89%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


ISBG and GLD have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ISBG.

ISBG has the higher dividend yield at 10.89%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

ISBG is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GLD is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Quantify Funds and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for ISBG and 0.40% for GLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISBG and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer