ISBG vs. GLD
ISBG (IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - ISBG is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Quantify Funds, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. ISBG is actively managed, while GLD is passively managed. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ISBG charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
ISBG vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ISBG
- 1D
- -5.93%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- 6M
- -48.68%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GLD
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- 6M
- -16.50%
- YTD
- -6.25%
- 1Y
- 20.20%
- 3Y*
- 27.22%
- 5Y*
- 16.95%
- 10Y*
- 11.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.38B | $2.40B | $2.72B | |
| $42.46K | $50.36K | $140.11K |
ISBG vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ISBG IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF | -52.80% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | -15.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISBG and GLD is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2026 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISBG vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
ISBG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GLD
ISBG vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF (ISBG) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISBG | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.86 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.86 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISBG vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISBG drawdown since its inception was -59.16%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISBG and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISBG | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.16% | -45.56% | -13.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.84% | -25.08% | -31.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.17% | -16.21% | -15.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.18% | — |
Volatility
ISBG vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISBG | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.44% | 28.13% | +44.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.44% | 18.49% | +53.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.44% | 16.14% | +56.30% |
ISBG vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISBG has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISBG vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
ISBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.20%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% |
ISBG IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF | 16.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISBG and GLD have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ISBG.
ISBG has the higher dividend yield at 16.20%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
ISBG is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GLD is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Quantify Funds and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for ISBG and 0.40% for GLD.
Find the right allocation for ISBG and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer