ISBG vs. XBCI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ISBG (IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF) and XBCI (NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ISBG charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for XBCI.

Performance

ISBG vs. XBCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF (ISBG) and NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ISBG

• 1D: -7.03%
• 1M: -38.10%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XBCI

• 1D: -4.70%
• 1M: -25.10%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISBG vs. XBCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ISBG IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF	-39.22%
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	-23.52%

Correlation

The correlation between ISBG and XBCI is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026	0.82

Return for Risk

ISBG vs. XBCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF (ISBG) and NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

ISBG vs. XBCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISBG drawdown since its inception was -55.08%, which is greater than XBCI's maximum drawdown of -34.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISBG and XBCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISBG	XBCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.08%	-34.73%	-20.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.08%	-31.48%	-23.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.29%	-11.48%	-14.81%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ISBG	XBCI	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	76.10%	67.34%	+8.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	76.10%	67.34%	+8.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	76.10%	67.34%	+8.76%

ISBG vs. XBCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISBG has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than XBCI's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISBG vs. XBCI - Dividend Comparison

ISBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.66%, less than XBCI's 22.16% yield.

Position	TTM
ISBG IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF	13.66%
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	22.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISBG and XBCI in my portfolio?

ISBG and XBCI have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ISBG or XBCI?

On fees, XBCI is cheaper at 0.98% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ISBG or XBCI?

XBCI is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ISBG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ISBG or XBCI?

XBCI has the higher dividend yield at 22.16%, compared with 13.66% for ISBG.

What is the main difference between ISBG and XBCI?

They also come from different issuers: Quantify Funds and Neos. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for ISBG and 0.98% for XBCI.