ISBG vs. EZPZ
ISBG (IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF) and EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ISBG is actively managed, while EZPZ is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ISBG charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZPZ.
Performance
ISBG vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ISBG
- 1D
- -7.03%
- 1M
- -38.10%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZPZ
- 1D
- -3.39%
- 1M
- -18.22%
- YTD
- -32.10%
- 6M
- -32.65%
- 1Y
- -40.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISBG vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ISBG IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF | -50.88% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -33.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISBG and EZPZ is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2026 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISBG vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank
ISBG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EZPZ
ISBG vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF (ISBG) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISBG | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.87 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.72 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISBG vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISBG drawdown since its inception was -55.08%, roughly equal to the maximum EZPZ drawdown of -55.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISBG and EZPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISBG | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.08% | -55.78% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -55.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.08% | -54.21% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.29% | -22.87% | -3.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 32.74% | — |
Volatility
ISBG vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISBG | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 37.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.10% | 47.70% | +28.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.10% | 47.87% | +28.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.10% | 47.87% | +28.23% |
ISBG vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISBG has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISBG vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison
ISBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.66%, while EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | 0.00% |
ISBG IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF | 13.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISBG and EZPZ have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ISBG.
ISBG has the higher dividend yield at 13.66%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.
They also come from different issuers: Quantify Funds and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for ISBG and 0.19% for EZPZ.
Find the right allocation for ISBG and EZPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer