ISAG.L vs. EIMI.L
ISAG.L (iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and EIMI.L (iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISAG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc), while EIMI.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISAG.L returned 7.24%/yr vs 9.25%/yr for EIMI.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISAG.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EIMI.L.
Performance
ISAG.L vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISAG.L achieves a 11.78% return, which is significantly lower than EIMI.L's 18.64% return. Over the past 10 years, ISAG.L has underperformed EIMI.L with an annualized return of 7.24%, while EIMI.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.25% annualized return.
ISAG.L
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 1Y
- 14.56%
- 3Y*
- 5.53%
- 5Y*
- 4.56%
- 10Y*
- 7.24%
EIMI.L
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -6.07%
- 6M
- 13.34%
- YTD
- 18.64%
- 1Y
- 34.63%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 7.21%
- 10Y*
- 9.25%
ISAG.L vs. EIMI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISAG.L iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.78% | 16.78% | -5.66% | -8.90% | 2.73% | 23.33% | 10.28% | 17.65% | -12.99% | 19.93% |
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 18.64% | 32.16% | 7.36% | 11.03% | -19.67% | -0.65% | 18.80% | 16.37% | -14.18% | 36.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISAG.L and EIMI.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2014 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ISAG.L and EIMI.L has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISAG.L vs. EIMI.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISAG.L
EIMI.L
ISAG.L vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAG.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISAG.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.30 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 2.72 | -1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.36 | 8.68 | -4.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISAG.L vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISAG.L drawdown since its inception was -37.16%, roughly equal to the maximum EIMI.L drawdown of -38.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISAG.L and EIMI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISAG.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.16% | -38.73% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.17% | -12.66% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.13% | -17.44% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.22% | -33.69% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.16% | -38.73% | +1.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.20% | -7.71% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.38% | -13.92% | +3.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 3.98% | -0.36% |
Volatility
ISAG.L vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAG.L) is 2.94%, while iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a volatility of 8.59%. This indicates that ISAG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIMI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISAG.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 8.59% | -5.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.25% | 19.48% | -9.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.50% | 21.43% | -7.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 18.83% | -1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.84% | 19.22% | -1.38% |
ISAG.L vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISAG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISAG.L vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ISAG.L nor EIMI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ISAG.L and EIMI.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EIMI.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EIMI.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ISAG.L.
ISAG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while EIMI.L is Emerging Markets Equities. ISAG.L tracks iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc), while EIMI.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ISAG.L and 0.18% for EIMI.L.
Find the right allocation for ISAG.L and EIMI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer