PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISAC.L vs. FWRG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISAC.L vs. FWRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ISAC.L having a 11.65% return and FWRG.L slightly higher at 11.97%.


ISAC.L

1D
-0.62%
1M
4.39%
YTD
11.65%
6M
13.33%
1Y
29.59%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
11.41%
10Y*
12.76%

FWRG.L

1D
-0.38%
1M
5.96%
YTD
11.97%
6M
12.52%
1Y
30.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISAC.L vs. FWRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.65%22.36%17.81%8.81%
FWRG.L
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc
11.97%13.84%20.11%8.08%

Correlation

The correlation between ISAC.L and FWRG.L is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023

0.78

The correlation between ISAC.L and FWRG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISAC.L vs. FWRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISAC.L
FWRG.L

Technology

33.9%
29.1%

Financial Services

17.3%
16.4%

Industrials

9.0%
11.0%

Communication Services

8.6%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
9.4%

Healthcare

7.8%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
5.0%

Energy

3.6%
4.3%

Basic Materials

2.9%
3.9%

Utilities

2.2%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.2%
1.9%

Technology

ISAC.L
33.9%
FWRG.L
29.1%

Financial Services

ISAC.L
17.3%
FWRG.L
16.4%

Industrials

ISAC.L
9.0%
FWRG.L
11.0%

Communication Services

ISAC.L
8.6%
FWRG.L
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ISAC.L
8.5%
FWRG.L
9.4%

Healthcare

ISAC.L
7.8%
FWRG.L
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

ISAC.L
4.4%
FWRG.L
5.0%

Energy

ISAC.L
3.6%
FWRG.L
4.3%

Basic Materials

ISAC.L
2.9%
FWRG.L
3.9%

Utilities

ISAC.L
2.2%
FWRG.L
2.6%

Real Estate

ISAC.L
1.2%
FWRG.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISAC.L vs. FWRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISAC.L
ISAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FWRG.L
FWRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FWRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISAC.L vs. FWRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISAC.LFWRG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.56

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

4.23

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.09

17.11

-3.02

ISAC.L vs. FWRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISAC.L and FWRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISAC.LFWRG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

2.93

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

1.51

-0.76

Drawdowns

ISAC.L vs. FWRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISAC.L drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, which is greater than FWRG.L's maximum drawdown of -18.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISAC.L and FWRG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISAC.LFWRG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.82%

-18.88%

-14.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.77%

-7.14%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-0.38%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-2.28%

-2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

1.77%

+0.32%

Volatility

ISAC.L vs. FWRG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) at 2.96%. This indicates that ISAC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FWRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISAC.LFWRG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

2.96%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.77%

7.69%

+2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.42%

10.33%

+2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.57%

12.41%

+3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.95%

12.41%

+3.54%

ISAC.L vs. FWRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISAC.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FWRG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ISAC.L vs. FWRG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ISAC.L nor FWRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ISAC.L and FWRG.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FWRG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FWRG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ISAC.L.

ISAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index, while FWRG.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ISAC.L and 0.15% for FWRG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISAC.L and FWRG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer