FWRG.L vs. ACWI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FWRG.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both Global Equities funds - FWRG.L tracks the FTSE All-World Index while ACWI tracks the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FWRG.L returned 30.35% vs 29.18% for ACWI. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FWRG.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.

Performance

FWRG.L vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FWRG.L having a 11.97% return and ACWI slightly higher at 12.13%.

FWRG.L

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 5.96%
• YTD: 11.97%
• 6M: 12.52%
• 1Y: 30.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACWI

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 5.28%
• YTD: 12.13%
• 6M: 12.96%
• 1Y: 29.18%
• 3Y*: 21.15%
• 5Y*: 11.28%
• 10Y*: 12.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWRG.L vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FWRG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc	11.97%	13.84%	20.11%	8.08%
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	12.13%	22.41%	17.45%	8.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FWRG.L and ACWI is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.48

The correlation between FWRG.L and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

FWRG.L vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FWRG.L	ACWI
Technology	29.1%	29.4%
Financial Services	16.4%	16.1%
Industrials	11.0%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	9.3%
Communication Services	8.9%	9.0%
Healthcare	7.6%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	5.0%
Energy	4.3%	4.2%
Basic Materials	3.9%	3.7%
Utilities	2.6%	2.6%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.8%

Return for Risk

FWRG.L vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWRG.L

FWRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 85
FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FWRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FWRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FWRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FWRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 83

ACWI

ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 66
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWRG.L vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FWRG.L	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.93	2.29	+0.64
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.06	3.17	+0.89
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.41	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.23	3.01	+1.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.11	13.53	+3.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FWRG.L vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is comparable to the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWRG.L and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FWRG.L	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.93	2.29	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.51	0.43	+1.08

Drawdowns

FWRG.L vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWRG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.88%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWRG.L and ACWI.

Drawdown Indicators

	FWRG.L	ACWI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.88%	-56.00%	+37.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.14%	-9.73%	+2.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.55%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.42%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.38%	-0.83%	+0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.28%	-8.61%	+6.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.77%	2.16%	-0.39%

Volatility

FWRG.L vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) is 2.96%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that FWRG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FWRG.L	ACWI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.96%	3.93%	-0.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.69%	10.29%	-2.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.33%	12.78%	-2.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.41%	16.05%	-3.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.41%	17.11%	-4.70%

FWRG.L vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWRG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

FWRG.L vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

FWRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	1.38%	1.55%	1.70%	1.88%	1.79%	1.71%	1.43%	2.33%	2.18%	1.94%	2.19%	2.56%
FWRG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FWRG.L and ACWI in my portfolio?

FWRG.L and ACWI have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FWRG.L or ACWI?

On fees, FWRG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FWRG.L or ACWI?

FWRG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

What is the main difference between FWRG.L and ACWI?

FWRG.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FWRG.L and 0.32% for ACWI.