PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS3N.DE vs. SXRV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS3N.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS3N.DE achieves a 25.82% return, which is significantly higher than SXRV.DE's 20.57% return. Over the past 10 years, IS3N.DE has underperformed SXRV.DE with an annualized return of 10.00%, while SXRV.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 21.24% annualized return.


IS3N.DE

1D
-1.45%
1M
5.25%
YTD
25.82%
6M
27.45%
1Y
46.76%
3Y*
19.99%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
10.00%

SXRV.DE

1D
-0.83%
1M
9.26%
YTD
20.57%
6M
19.43%
1Y
37.81%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
18.67%
10Y*
21.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS3N.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IS3N.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
25.82%17.14%13.87%7.20%-14.09%7.38%7.07%21.01%-11.06%20.43%
SXRV.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
20.57%6.98%33.55%51.19%-30.05%39.34%34.48%42.90%3.03%15.81%

Correlation

The correlation between IS3N.DE and SXRV.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014

0.65

The correlation between IS3N.DE and SXRV.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (5 years) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS3N.DE vs. SXRV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS3N.DE
IS3N.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SXRV.DE
SXRV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SXRV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS3N.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IS3N.DESXRV.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.42

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.42

3.75

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.00

11.16

+4.85

IS3N.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the SXRV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS3N.DE and SXRV.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IS3N.DESXRV.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

2.40

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.93

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

1.07

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.91

-0.47

Drawdowns

IS3N.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS3N.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.06%, which is greater than SXRV.DE's maximum drawdown of -32.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3N.DE and SXRV.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS3N.DESXRV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.06%

-32.80%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-10.03%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.17%

-26.69%

+7.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.01%

-31.33%

+9.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

-31.33%

-1.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.49%

-0.83%

-1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.30%

-6.56%

-2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

3.38%

-0.47%

Volatility

IS3N.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.16% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE) at 4.26%. This indicates that IS3N.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SXRV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS3N.DESXRV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.16%

4.26%

+2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.69%

10.98%

+3.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.32%

15.67%

+1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.19%

19.84%

-3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

19.65%

-1.61%

IS3N.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS3N.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SXRV.DE's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

IS3N.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IS3N.DE nor SXRV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IS3N.DE and SXRV.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IS3N.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IS3N.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SXRV.DE.

IS3N.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SXRV.DE is Nasdaq-100. IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI), while SXRV.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IS3N.DE and 0.36% for SXRV.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS3N.DE and SXRV.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer