IS3N.DE vs. FLXE.L
IS3N.DE (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) and FLXE.L (Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - IS3N.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI) while FLXE.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IS3N.DE returned 8.61%/yr vs 7.65%/yr for FLXE.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IS3N.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FLXE.L.
Performance
IS3N.DE vs. FLXE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IS3N.DE is traded in EUR, while FLXE.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLXE.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS3N.DE achieves a 25.82% return, which is significantly higher than FLXE.L's 16.62% return.
IS3N.DE
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- 25.82%
- 6M
- 27.45%
- 1Y
- 46.76%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
FLXE.L
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 16.62%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 30.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.81%
- 5Y*
- 7.65%
- 10Y*
- —
IS3N.DE vs. FLXE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 25.82% | 17.14% | 13.87% | 7.20% | -14.09% | 7.38% | 7.07% | 21.01% | -11.06% | 3.23% |
FLXE.L Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF | 16.62% | 12.67% | 13.32% | 8.74% | -14.34% | 15.51% | -6.97% | 14.85% | -7.40% | 3.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS3N.DE and FLXE.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2017 | 0.81 |
The correlation between IS3N.DE and FLXE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS3N.DE vs. FLXE.L — Risk / Return Rank
IS3N.DE
FLXE.L
IS3N.DE vs. FLXE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) and Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IS3N.DE | FLXE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.40 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.42 | 3.15 | +1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.00 | 11.78 | +4.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IS3N.DE | FLXE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 2.30 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.57 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.37 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
IS3N.DE vs. FLXE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS3N.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.06%, which is greater than FLXE.L's maximum drawdown of -33.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3N.DE and FLXE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS3N.DE | FLXE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.06% | -33.08% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.52% | -9.50% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.17% | -13.10% | -6.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.01% | -18.65% | -3.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.49% | -1.99% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.30% | -7.22% | -2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 2.55% | +0.36% |
Volatility
IS3N.DE vs. FLXE.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.16% compared to Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.L) at 4.66%. This indicates that IS3N.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS3N.DE | FLXE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.16% | 4.66% | +2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.69% | 10.86% | +3.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.32% | 13.02% | +4.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 13.52% | +2.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 15.96% | +2.08% |
IS3N.DE vs. FLXE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IS3N.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXE.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
IS3N.DE vs. FLXE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IS3N.DE nor FLXE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IS3N.DE and FLXE.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IS3N.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IS3N.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FLXE.L.
IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI), while FLXE.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IS3N.DE and 0.45% for FLXE.L.
Find the right allocation for IS3N.DE and FLXE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer