FLXE.L vs. XEMD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.L).
FLXE.L and XEMD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLXE.L is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Oct 17, 2017. XEMD.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Nov 3, 2021. Both FLXE.L and XEMD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLXE.L vs. XEMD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLXE.L vs. XEMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXE.L Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF | 7.01% | 18.87% | 8.11% | 6.48% | -9.68% | 1.51% |
XEMD.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D | 5.81% | 40.45% | 2.34% | 8.02% | -16.25% | -3.49% |
Different Trading Currencies
FLXE.L is traded in GBP, while XEMD.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XEMD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXE.L achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly higher than XEMD.L's 5.81% return.
FLXE.L
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- YTD
- 7.01%
- 6M
- 13.30%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- 13.08%
- 5Y*
- 6.70%
- 10Y*
- —
XEMD.L
- 1D
- 4.38%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- 5.81%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 40.83%
- 3Y*
- 16.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLXE.L vs. XEMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXE.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XEMD.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLXE.L vs. XEMD.L — Risk / Return Rank
FLXE.L
XEMD.L
FLXE.L vs. XEMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLXE.L | XEMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | 2.20 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.61 | 2.82 | -0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.42 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 2.90 | -0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.93 | 10.21 | -0.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLXE.L | XEMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 2.20 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.46 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXE.L and XEMD.L is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FLXE.L vs. XEMD.L - Dividend Comparison
FLXE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XEMD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXE.L Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XEMD.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D | 1.63% | 1.63% | 2.88% | 2.15% | 2.52% |
Drawdowns
FLXE.L vs. XEMD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXE.L drawdown since its inception was -26.37%, smaller than the maximum XEMD.L drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXE.L and XEMD.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXE.L | XEMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.37% | -31.57% | +5.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.11% | -13.23% | +3.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.17% | -9.13% | +2.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.06% | -9.69% | +3.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 3.84% | -1.21% |
Volatility
FLXE.L vs. XEMD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.L) is 5.91%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.L) has a volatility of 8.75%. This indicates that FLXE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEMD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLXE.L | XEMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.91% | 8.75% | -2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.16% | 14.15% | -3.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.37% | 19.44% | -6.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.95% | 21.74% | -8.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.45% | 21.74% | -6.29% |