IS3G.DE vs. XB4A.DE
IS3G.DE (iShares MSCI EMU Large Cap UCITS ETF) and XB4A.DE (Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - IS3G.DE tracks the MSCI EMU Large Cap while XB4A.DE tracks the ATX Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IS3G.DE returned 10.37%/yr vs 14.60%/yr for XB4A.DE. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IS3G.DE charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XB4A.DE.
Performance
IS3G.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS3G.DE achieves a 10.00% return, which is significantly lower than XB4A.DE's 22.80% return. Over the past 10 years, IS3G.DE has underperformed XB4A.DE with an annualized return of 10.37%, while XB4A.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 14.60% annualized return.
IS3G.DE
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- YTD
- 10.00%
- 1Y
- 19.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
XB4A.DE
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- 6M
- 19.27%
- YTD
- 22.80%
- 1Y
- 45.21%
- 3Y*
- 30.57%
- 5Y*
- 17.80%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
IS3G.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS3G.DE iShares MSCI EMU Large Cap UCITS ETF | 10.00% | 22.66% | 8.54% | 20.59% | -11.41% | 23.33% | -2.19% | 29.77% | -12.62% | 11.55% |
XB4A.DE Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) | 22.80% | 51.29% | 11.01% | 14.27% | -16.45% | 42.39% | -10.86% | 19.79% | -17.99% | 32.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS3G.DE and XB4A.DE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2013 | 0.74 |
The correlation between IS3G.DE and XB4A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS3G.DE vs. XB4A.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IS3G.DE
XB4A.DE
IS3G.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU Large Cap UCITS ETF (IS3G.DE) and Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IS3G.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.43 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 4.13 | -2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.59 | 13.97 | -7.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IS3G.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS3G.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, smaller than the maximum XB4A.DE drawdown of -53.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3G.DE and XB4A.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS3G.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.65% | -53.54% | +14.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.55% | -10.88% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.83% | -16.26% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.14% | -32.50% | +8.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.65% | -53.54% | +14.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.28% | -3.43% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.12% | -9.88% | +3.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 3.23% | -0.34% |
Volatility
IS3G.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EMU Large Cap UCITS ETF (IS3G.DE) is 4.32%, while Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that IS3G.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XB4A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS3G.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | 4.97% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.08% | 14.95% | -1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.41% | 17.66% | -2.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 19.15% | -2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 20.15% | -3.06% |
IS3G.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IS3G.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than XB4A.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IS3G.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IS3G.DE nor XB4A.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IS3G.DE and XB4A.DE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XB4A.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XB4A.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for IS3G.DE.
IS3G.DE tracks MSCI EMU Large Cap, while XB4A.DE tracks ATX Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for IS3G.DE and 0.25% for XB4A.DE.
Find the right allocation for IS3G.DE and XB4A.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer