IS20.DE vs. IS3N.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IS20.DE (iShares S&P 500 Top 20 UCITS ETF USD Acc) and IS3N.DE (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IS20.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 20 Index, while IS3N.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IS20.DE returned 30.08% vs 45.77% for IS3N.DE. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IS20.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IS3N.DE.

Performance

IS20.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Top 20 UCITS ETF USD Acc (IS20.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS20.DE achieves a 9.38% return, which is significantly lower than IS3N.DE's 25.82% return.

IS20.DE

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 4.82%
• YTD: 9.38%
• 6M: 8.62%
• 1Y: 30.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IS3N.DE

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: 3.11%
• YTD: 25.82%
• 6M: 26.34%
• 1Y: 45.77%
• 3Y*: 19.99%
• 5Y*: 8.61%
• 10Y*: 10.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS20.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IS20.DE iShares S&P 500 Top 20 UCITS ETF USD Acc	9.38%	6.77%	6.20%
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)	25.82%	17.14%	0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IS20.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2024	0.60

The correlation between IS20.DE and IS3N.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IS20.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS20.DE

IS20.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
IS20.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
IS20.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
IS20.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 59
IS20.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
IS20.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 45

IS3N.DE

IS3N.DE Risk / Return Rank: 82
IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
IS3N.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
IS3N.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 82
IS3N.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
IS3N.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS20.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Top 20 UCITS ETF USD Acc (IS20.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IS20.DE	IS3N.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	2.69	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	3.59	-0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.49	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	4.42	-2.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.30	16.00	-8.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IS20.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS20.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS20.DE and IS3N.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IS20.DE	IS3N.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	2.69	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.44	+0.33

Drawdowns

IS20.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS20.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.30%, smaller than the maximum IS3N.DE drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS20.DE and IS3N.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	IS20.DE	IS3N.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.30%	-35.06%	+8.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.73%	-10.52%	-2.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.17%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.01%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.60%	-2.49%	+0.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.16%	-9.30%	+3.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.11%	2.91%	+1.20%

Volatility

IS20.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Top 20 UCITS ETF USD Acc (IS20.DE) is 3.65%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that IS20.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IS20.DE	IS3N.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.65%	7.16%	-3.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.03%	14.69%	-4.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.81%	17.32%	-2.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.57%	16.19%	+3.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.57%	18.04%	+1.53%

IS20.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS20.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IS20.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IS20.DE nor IS3N.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IS20.DE and IS3N.DE in my portfolio?

IS20.DE and IS3N.DE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IS20.DE or IS3N.DE?

On fees, IS20.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IS20.DE or IS3N.DE?

IS20.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IS3N.DE.

What is the main difference between IS20.DE and IS3N.DE?

IS20.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while IS3N.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. IS20.DE tracks S&P 500 Top 20 Index, while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IS20.DE and 0.18% for IS3N.DE.