IS20.DE vs. 2B7B.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IS20.DE (iShares S&P 500 Top 20 UCITS ETF USD Acc) and 2B7B.DE (iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IS20.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 20 Index, while 2B7B.DE is a Materials fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Materials Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IS20.DE returned 30.08% vs 16.17% for 2B7B.DE. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IS20.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for 2B7B.DE.

Performance

IS20.DE vs. 2B7B.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Top 20 UCITS ETF USD Acc (IS20.DE) and iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7B.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS20.DE achieves a 9.38% return, which is significantly lower than 2B7B.DE's 12.98% return.

IS20.DE

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 4.82%
• YTD: 9.38%
• 6M: 8.62%
• 1Y: 30.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

2B7B.DE

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 1.48%
• YTD: 12.98%
• 6M: 17.01%
• 1Y: 16.17%
• 3Y*: 8.06%
• 5Y*: 5.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS20.DE vs. 2B7B.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IS20.DE iShares S&P 500 Top 20 UCITS ETF USD Acc	9.38%	6.77%	6.20%
2B7B.DE iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF	12.98%	-1.07%	-6.38%

Correlation

The correlation between IS20.DE and 2B7B.DE is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2024	0.34

The correlation between IS20.DE and 2B7B.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IS20.DE vs. 2B7B.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS20.DE

IS20.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
IS20.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
IS20.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
IS20.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 59
IS20.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
IS20.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 45

2B7B.DE

2B7B.DE Risk / Return Rank: 30
2B7B.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
2B7B.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
2B7B.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 28
2B7B.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
2B7B.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS20.DE vs. 2B7B.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Top 20 UCITS ETF USD Acc (IS20.DE) and iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7B.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IS20.DE	2B7B.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	1.04	+0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	1.55	+1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.18	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	1.58	+0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.30	4.68	+2.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IS20.DE vs. 2B7B.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS20.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the 2B7B.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS20.DE and 2B7B.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IS20.DE	2B7B.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	1.04	+0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.45	+0.32

Drawdowns

IS20.DE vs. 2B7B.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS20.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.30%, smaller than the maximum 2B7B.DE drawdown of -34.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS20.DE and 2B7B.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	IS20.DE	2B7B.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.30%	-34.61%	+8.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.73%	-10.19%	-2.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.54%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.60%	-2.44%	+0.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.16%	-6.21%	+0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.11%	3.44%	+0.67%

Volatility

IS20.DE vs. 2B7B.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Top 20 UCITS ETF USD Acc (IS20.DE) is 3.65%, while iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7B.DE) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that IS20.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2B7B.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IS20.DE	2B7B.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.65%	4.84%	-1.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.03%	12.31%	-2.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.81%	15.43%	-0.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.57%	17.20%	+2.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.57%	19.16%	+0.41%

IS20.DE vs. 2B7B.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS20.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than 2B7B.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IS20.DE vs. 2B7B.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IS20.DE nor 2B7B.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IS20.DE and 2B7B.DE in my portfolio?

IS20.DE and 2B7B.DE have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IS20.DE or 2B7B.DE?

On fees, IS20.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IS20.DE or 2B7B.DE?

IS20.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 2B7B.DE.

What is the main difference between IS20.DE and 2B7B.DE?

IS20.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while 2B7B.DE is Materials. IS20.DE tracks S&P 500 Top 20 Index, while 2B7B.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Materials Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IS20.DE and 0.15% for 2B7B.DE.