IS0Z.DE vs. IS3N.DE
IS0Z.DE (iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)) and IS3N.DE (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IS0Z.DE is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Government AAA-AA Capped Bond, while IS3N.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IS0Z.DE returned -0.58%/yr vs 10.00%/yr for IS3N.DE. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IS0Z.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IS3N.DE.
Performance
IS0Z.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS0Z.DE achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than IS3N.DE's 25.82% return. Over the past 10 years, IS0Z.DE has underperformed IS3N.DE with an annualized return of -0.58%, while IS3N.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.00% annualized return.
IS0Z.DE
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 0.23%
- 3Y*
- 1.18%
- 5Y*
- -2.11%
- 10Y*
- -0.58%
IS3N.DE
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 25.82%
- 6M
- 26.34%
- 1Y
- 45.77%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
IS0Z.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS0Z.DE iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) | 1.29% | -1.88% | 0.75% | 4.39% | -16.12% | -0.07% | 2.03% | 7.04% | 1.73% | -3.57% |
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 25.82% | 17.14% | 13.87% | 7.20% | -14.09% | 7.38% | 7.07% | 21.01% | -11.06% | 20.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS0Z.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014 | 0.11 |
Over the past year, IS0Z.DE and IS3N.DE have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS0Z.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IS0Z.DE
IS3N.DE
IS0Z.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS0Z.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IS0Z.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.49 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | 4.42 | -4.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.19 | 16.00 | -15.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IS0Z.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 | 2.69 | -2.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | 0.53 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 | 0.55 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.44 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
IS0Z.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS0Z.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.02%, smaller than the maximum IS3N.DE drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS0Z.DE and IS3N.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS0Z.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.02% | -35.06% | +14.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.50% | -10.52% | +8.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.11% | -19.17% | +14.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.65% | -22.01% | +2.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.02% | -32.51% | +11.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.06% | -2.49% | -12.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.48% | -9.30% | +1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.21% | 2.91% | -1.70% |
Volatility
IS0Z.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS0Z.DE) is 1.69%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that IS0Z.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS0Z.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.69% | 7.16% | -5.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.07% | 14.69% | -11.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.82% | 17.32% | -13.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.19% | 16.19% | -10.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.66% | 18.04% | -12.38% |
IS0Z.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IS0Z.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IS0Z.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison
IS0Z.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, while IS3N.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS0Z.DE iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.67% | 2.51% | 2.30% | 1.57% | 0.80% | 0.47% | 0.62% | 0.88% | 0.90% | 0.82% | 0.84% | 1.06% |
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IS0Z.DE and IS3N.DE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IS3N.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IS3N.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IS0Z.DE.
IS0Z.DE is categorized as Global Bonds, while IS3N.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. IS0Z.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Government AAA-AA Capped Bond, while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IS0Z.DE and 0.18% for IS3N.DE.
Find the right allocation for IS0Z.DE and IS3N.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer