IS0Z.DE vs. DBZB.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS0Z.DE) and Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (DBZB.DE).

IS0Z.DE and DBZB.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IS0Z.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Government AAA-AA Capped Bond. It was launched on Oct 3, 2012. DBZB.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the FTSE World Government Bond - Developed Markets (EUR Hedged). It was launched on Oct 20, 2008. Both IS0Z.DE and DBZB.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IS0Z.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS0Z.DE) and Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (DBZB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IS0Z.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IS0Z.DE iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)	0.54%	-1.88%	0.75%	4.39%	-16.12%	-0.07%	2.03%	7.04%	1.73%	-3.57%
DBZB.DE Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged	-0.53%	1.28%	-0.41%	3.56%	-15.11%	-3.19%	4.16%	4.55%	-0.36%	-0.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS0Z.DE achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly higher than DBZB.DE's -0.53% return. Over the past 10 years, IS0Z.DE has outperformed DBZB.DE with an annualized return of -0.59%, while DBZB.DE has yielded a comparatively lower -0.93% annualized return.

IS0Z.DE

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -1.60%
• YTD: 0.54%
• 6M: 0.63%
• 1Y: -0.16%
• 3Y*: 0.51%
• 5Y*: -2.49%
• 10Y*: -0.59%

DBZB.DE

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -1.41%
• YTD: -0.53%
• 6M: -0.82%
• 1Y: -0.05%
• 3Y*: 0.34%
• 5Y*: -2.52%
• 10Y*: -0.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS0Z.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS0Z.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DBZB.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

DBZB.DE

Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged

IS0Z.DE

iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)

Return for Risk

IS0Z.DE vs. DBZB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS0Z.DE

IS0Z.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9
IS0Z.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
IS0Z.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
IS0Z.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9
IS0Z.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
IS0Z.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8

DBZB.DE

DBZB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9
DBZB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
DBZB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
DBZB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 10
DBZB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
DBZB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS0Z.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS0Z.DE) and Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (DBZB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IS0Z.DE	DBZB.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.04	-0.01	-0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.03	0.02	-0.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.00	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.17	-0.23	+0.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.36	-0.40	+0.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IS0Z.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS0Z.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the DBZB.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS0Z.DE and DBZB.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IS0Z.DE	DBZB.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04	-0.01	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.40	-0.47	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.10	-0.20	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	0.23	-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between IS0Z.DE and DBZB.DE is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

IS0Z.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Dividend Comparison

IS0Z.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, while DBZB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IS0Z.DE iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)	2.50%	2.51%	2.30%	1.57%	0.80%	0.47%	0.62%	0.88%	0.90%	0.82%	0.84%	1.06%
DBZB.DE Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

IS0Z.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS0Z.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.02%, roughly equal to the maximum DBZB.DE drawdown of -21.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS0Z.DE and DBZB.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	IS0Z.DE	DBZB.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.02%	-21.88%	+0.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.50%	-3.37%	+0.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.65%	-19.51%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.02%	-21.88%	+0.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.69%	-16.29%	+0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.38%	-5.86%	-1.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.16%	1.95%	-0.79%

Volatility

IS0Z.DE vs. DBZB.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS0Z.DE) is 1.51%, while Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (DBZB.DE) has a volatility of 1.67%. This indicates that IS0Z.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBZB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IS0Z.DE	DBZB.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.51%	1.67%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.35%	2.61%	-0.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.89%	4.46%	-0.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.14%	5.32%	+0.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.64%	4.71%	+0.93%