IRVH vs. VTP
IRVH (Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF) and VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. IRVH is actively managed, while VTP is passively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IRVH charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VTP.
Performance
IRVH vs. VTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRVH achieves a -3.32% return, which is significantly lower than VTP's 1.51% return.
IRVH
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- YTD
- -3.32%
- 6M
- -3.31%
- 1Y
- -1.82%
- 3Y*
- -0.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTP
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IRVH vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | -3.32% | 1.36% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.51% | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRVH and VTP is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRVH vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank
IRVH
VTP
IRVH vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IRVH | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IRVH | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.22 | 1.30 | -1.52 |
Drawdowns
IRVH vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRVH drawdown since its inception was -14.98%, which is greater than VTP's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRVH and VTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRVH | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.98% | -1.92% | -13.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.32% | -0.34% | -9.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.72% | -0.52% | -9.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | — | — |
Volatility
IRVH vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRVH | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.71% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.27% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.96% | 3.26% | +1.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.84% | 3.26% | +5.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.84% | 3.26% | +5.58% |
IRVH vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRVH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VTP's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
IRVH vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison
IRVH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.56%, more than VTP's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | 5.56% | 4.89% | 3.34% | 3.69% | 2.73% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.61% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IRVH and VTP have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IRVH.
IRVH has the higher dividend yield at 5.56%, compared with 1.61% for VTP.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IRVH and 0.05% for VTP.
Find the right allocation for IRVH and VTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer