IRVH vs. RINF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IRVH (Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF) and RINF (ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. IRVH is actively managed, while RINF is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IRVH returned -0.04%/yr vs 3.95%/yr for RINF. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. IRVH charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for RINF.

Performance

IRVH vs. RINF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRVH achieves a -4.51% return, which is significantly lower than RINF's 1.15% return.

IRVH

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -1.33%
• YTD: -4.51%
• 6M: -4.08%
• 1Y: -2.73%
• 3Y*: -0.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RINF

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -1.35%
• YTD: 1.15%
• 6M: 1.46%
• 1Y: 1.86%
• 3Y*: 3.95%
• 5Y*: 5.32%
• 10Y*: 4.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRVH vs. RINF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF	-4.51%	7.71%	-5.49%	0.83%	-6.69%
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF	1.15%	1.64%	9.79%	0.21%	6.65%

Correlation

The correlation between IRVH and RINF is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2022	-0.07

Return for Risk

IRVH vs. RINF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRVH

IRVH Risk / Return Rank: 4
IRVH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
IRVH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
IRVH Omega Ratio Rank: 4
IRVH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
IRVH Martin Ratio Rank: 4

RINF

RINF Risk / Return Rank: 15
RINF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
RINF Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
RINF Omega Ratio Rank: 13
RINF Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
RINF Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRVH vs. RINF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IRVH	RINF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.57	0.43	-1.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.77	0.64	-1.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.07	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.45	0.72	-1.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.04	1.35	-2.40

IRVH vs. RINF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRVH Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the RINF Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRVH and RINF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IRVH vs. RINF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRVH drawdown since its inception was -14.98%, smaller than the maximum RINF drawdown of -43.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRVH and RINF.

Drawdown Indicators

	IRVH	RINF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.98%	-43.51%	+28.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.11%	-2.60%	-3.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.03%	-9.62%	+1.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.58%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-29.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.42%	-1.85%	-9.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.72%	-16.40%	+6.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.63%	1.38%	+1.25%

Volatility

IRVH vs. RINF - Volatility Comparison

Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) have volatilities of 1.08% and 1.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IRVH	RINF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.08%	1.04%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.35%	2.89%	+0.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.85%	4.40%	+0.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.80%	12.74%	-3.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.80%	12.55%	-3.75%

IRVH vs. RINF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRVH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RINF's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

IRVH vs. RINF - Dividend Comparison

IRVH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%, more than RINF's 3.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF	5.63%	4.89%	3.34%	3.69%	2.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF	3.75%	3.89%	4.68%	5.07%	1.15%	2.76%	0.82%	1.90%	2.47%	2.99%	1.09%	1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IRVH and RINF in my portfolio?

IRVH and RINF have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IRVH or RINF?

IRVH has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to RINF (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRVH dropped -14.98% vs RINF's -43.51%.

Which ETF is better, IRVH or RINF?

On 3-year performance, RINF leads with 3.95% vs -0.04% for IRVH. On fees, RINF is cheaper at 0.30% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IRVH or RINF?

Over the 3-year period, RINF has performed better with a 3.95% return vs -0.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IRVH or RINF?

RINF is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IRVH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IRVH or RINF?

IRVH has the higher dividend yield at 5.63%, compared with 3.75% for RINF.

What is the main difference between IRVH and RINF?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IRVH and 0.30% for RINF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RINF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.