PortfoliosLab logo
IRVH vs. RINF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IRVH and RINF is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

IRVH vs. RINF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IRVH:

0.99

RINF:

0.46

Sortino Ratio

IRVH:

1.15

RINF:

0.84

Omega Ratio

IRVH:

1.14

RINF:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

IRVH:

0.37

RINF:

0.59

Martin Ratio

IRVH:

1.41

RINF:

2.15

Ulcer Index

IRVH:

3.97%

RINF:

2.09%

Daily Std Dev

IRVH:

7.03%

RINF:

7.72%

Max Drawdown

IRVH:

-14.98%

RINF:

-43.45%

Current Drawdown

IRVH:

-8.61%

RINF:

-0.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRVH achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly higher than RINF's 1.58% return.


IRVH

YTD

6.11%

1M

-1.95%

6M

4.84%

1Y

6.76%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

RINF

YTD

1.58%

1M

2.76%

6M

3.52%

1Y

3.53%

3Y*

4.15%

5Y*

9.67%

10Y*

3.13%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IRVH vs. RINF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRVH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RINF's 0.30% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IRVH vs. RINF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRVH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IRVH is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IRVH is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IRVH is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IRVH is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IRVH is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IRVH is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

RINF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RINF is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RINF is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RINF is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RINF is 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RINF is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RINF is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IRVH vs. RINF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current IRVH Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is higher than the RINF Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRVH and RINF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

IRVH vs. RINF - Dividend Comparison

IRVH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than RINF's 4.43% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IRVH
Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF
3.07%3.34%3.70%2.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RINF
ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF
4.43%4.68%5.07%1.15%2.76%0.83%1.91%2.47%2.99%1.09%1.83%1.42%

Drawdowns

IRVH vs. RINF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRVH drawdown since its inception was -14.98%, smaller than the maximum RINF drawdown of -43.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRVH and RINF.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

IRVH vs. RINF - Volatility Comparison

Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) has a higher volatility of 2.52% compared to ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) at 1.95%. This indicates that IRVH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RINF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...