IRVH vs. SDIV
IRVH (Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF) and SDIV (Global X SuperDividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IRVH is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by Global X, while SDIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global SuperDividend Index. IRVH is actively managed, while SDIV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IRVH returned -0.10%/yr vs 14.11%/yr for SDIV. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IRVH charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for SDIV.
Performance
IRVH vs. SDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRVH achieves a -4.34% return, which is significantly lower than SDIV's 8.75% return.
IRVH
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- 6M
- -3.96%
- YTD
- -4.34%
- 1Y
- -3.05%
- 3Y*
- -0.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDIV
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 3.58%
- YTD
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 17.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.11%
- 5Y*
- 0.81%
- 10Y*
- -0.13%
IRVH vs. SDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | -4.34% | 7.71% | -5.49% | 0.83% | -6.69% |
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF | 8.75% | 29.12% | 1.77% | 5.46% | -5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRVH and SDIV is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2022 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRVH vs. SDIV — Risk / Return Rank
IRVH
SDIV
IRVH vs. SDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) and Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IRVH | SDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.25 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 2.40 | -2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 6.53 | -7.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IRVH vs. SDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRVH drawdown since its inception was -14.98%, smaller than the maximum SDIV drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRVH and SDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRVH | SDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.98% | -56.90% | +41.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.28% | -7.35% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.03% | -18.64% | +10.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.26% | -15.62% | +4.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.74% | -18.58% | +8.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 2.69% | +0.31% |
Volatility
IRVH vs. SDIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) is 1.28%, while Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) has a volatility of 2.72%. This indicates that IRVH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRVH | SDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | 2.72% | -1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.36% | 9.94% | -6.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.79% | 12.43% | -7.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.74% | 16.84% | -8.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.74% | 18.87% | -10.13% |
IRVH vs. SDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRVH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SDIV's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
IRVH vs. SDIV - Dividend Comparison
IRVH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, less than SDIV's 9.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | 5.66% | 4.89% | 3.34% | 3.69% | 2.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF | 9.02% | 9.59% | 11.33% | 11.73% | 14.17% | 8.95% | 7.96% | 8.73% | 9.22% | 6.66% | 6.95% | 7.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IRVH and SDIV have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDIV has higher volatility (2.72%) compared to IRVH (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRVH dropped -14.98% vs SDIV's -56.90%.
On 3-year performance, SDIV leads with 14.11% vs -0.10% for IRVH. On fees, IRVH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IRVH has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SDIV has performed better with a 14.11% return vs -0.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IRVH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SDIV.
SDIV has the higher dividend yield at 9.02%, compared with 5.66% for IRVH.
IRVH is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while SDIV is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IRVH and 0.58% for SDIV.
SDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IRVH and SDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer