PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRVH vs. RBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IRVH vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IRVH vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRVH achieves a -1.97% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 1.65% return.


IRVH

1D
0.04%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
-1.97%
6M
-1.43%
1Y
0.81%
3Y*
-0.66%
5Y*
10Y*

RBIL

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.03%
YTD
1.65%
6M
2.23%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IRVH vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRVH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IRVH vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRVH
IRVH Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
IRVH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRVH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRVH Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
IRVH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRVH Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

RBIL
RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRVH vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IRVHRBILDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.13

3.76

-3.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.22

6.07

-5.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

2.00

-0.98

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

7.98

-7.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.60

35.17

-34.56

IRVH vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRVH Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 3.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRVH and RBIL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IRVHRBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

3.76

-3.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.19

4.10

-4.28

Correlation

The correlation between IRVH and RBIL is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

IRVH vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

IRVH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, more than RBIL's 4.42% yield.


Drawdowns

IRVH vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRVH drawdown since its inception was -14.98%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRVH and RBIL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IRVHRBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.98%

-0.50%

-14.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.59%

-0.50%

-4.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.06%

-0.08%

-8.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.73%

-0.06%

-9.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

0.11%

+1.86%

Volatility

IRVH vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) has a higher volatility of 2.12% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.58%. This indicates that IRVH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IRVHRBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

0.58%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.50%

0.67%

+2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.29%

1.04%

+5.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.02%

1.03%

+7.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.02%

1.03%

+7.99%