IRVH vs. BOTZ
IRVH (Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IRVH is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by Global X, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. IRVH is actively managed, while BOTZ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IRVH returned -0.70%/yr vs 12.50%/yr for BOTZ. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IRVH charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
IRVH vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRVH achieves a -3.32% return, which is significantly lower than BOTZ's 10.63% return.
IRVH
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- YTD
- -3.32%
- 6M
- -3.31%
- 1Y
- -1.82%
- 3Y*
- -0.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOTZ
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 10.63%
- 6M
- 9.15%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 12.50%
- 5Y*
- 3.08%
- 10Y*
- —
IRVH vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | -3.32% | 7.71% | -5.49% | 0.83% | -6.69% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 10.63% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -0.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRVH and BOTZ is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2022 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRVH vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
IRVH
BOTZ
IRVH vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IRVH | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.21 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 1.48 | -1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | 5.08 | -5.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IRVH | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 | 1.19 | -1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.22 | 0.44 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
IRVH vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRVH drawdown since its inception was -14.98%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRVH and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRVH | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.98% | -55.54% | +40.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.94% | -19.34% | +14.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.03% | -29.02% | +20.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.32% | -3.72% | -6.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.72% | -18.32% | +8.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 5.63% | -3.28% |
Volatility
IRVH vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) is 0.71%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that IRVH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRVH | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.71% | 7.76% | -7.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.27% | 18.41% | -15.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.96% | 23.97% | -19.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.84% | 26.72% | -17.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.84% | 25.72% | -16.88% |
IRVH vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRVH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
IRVH vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
IRVH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.56%, more than BOTZ's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.59% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | 5.56% | 4.89% | 3.34% | 3.69% | 2.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IRVH and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOTZ has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to IRVH (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRVH dropped -14.98% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
On 3-year performance, BOTZ leads with 12.50% vs -0.70% for IRVH. On fees, IRVH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IRVH has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BOTZ has performed better with a 12.50% return vs -0.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IRVH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.
IRVH has the higher dividend yield at 5.56%, compared with 0.59% for BOTZ.
IRVH is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while BOTZ is Robotics. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IRVH and 0.68% for BOTZ.
BOTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IRVH and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer