IRVH vs. AMJB

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

IRVH (Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF) and AMJB (Alerian MLP Index ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - IRVH is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by Global X, while AMJB is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian MLP Index. IRVH is actively managed, while AMJB is passively managed. Over the past year, IRVH returned -3.63% vs 20.98% for AMJB. Their -0.07 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. IRVH charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for AMJB.

Performance

IRVH vs. AMJB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) and Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRVH achieves a -4.64% return, which is significantly lower than AMJB's 24.37% return.

IRVH

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -0.73%
• 6M: -4.05%
• YTD: -4.64%
• 1Y: -3.63%
• 3Y*: -0.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -2.20%

AMJB

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 8.01%
• 6M: 15.28%
• YTD: 24.37%
• 1Y: 20.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMJB Alerian MLP Index ETN	$783.43K	$933.84K	$1.09M
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF	$459.76	$1.90K	$4.28K

IRVH vs. AMJB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF	-4.64%	7.71%	-5.07%
AMJB Alerian MLP Index ETN	24.37%	1.36%	10.85%

Correlation

The correlation between IRVH and AMJB is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024	-0.07

Return for Risk

IRVH vs. AMJB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IRVH

IRVH Risk / Return Rank: 4
IRVH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
IRVH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
IRVH Omega Ratio Rank: 3
IRVH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
IRVH Martin Ratio Rank: 4

AMJB

AMJB Risk / Return Rank: 48
AMJB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
AMJB Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
AMJB Omega Ratio Rank: 46
AMJB Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
AMJB Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IRVH vs. AMJB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) and Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IRVH	AMJB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.79	1.29	-2.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.06	1.90	-2.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	1.22	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.56	1.79	-2.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.11	5.33	-6.44

IRVH vs. AMJB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRVH Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the AMJB Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRVH and AMJB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IRVH vs. AMJB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRVH drawdown since its inception was -14.98%, smaller than the maximum AMJB drawdown of -17.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRVH and AMJB.

Drawdown Indicators

	IRVH	AMJB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.98%	-17.70%	+2.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.48%	-11.80%	+5.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.54%	-0.72%	-10.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.76%	-5.02%	-4.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.28%	4.19%	-0.91%

Volatility

IRVH vs. AMJB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) is 0.82%, while Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that IRVH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMJB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IRVH	AMJB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.82%	5.38%	-4.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.18%	13.18%	-10.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.63%	16.49%	-11.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.69%	18.34%	-9.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.69%	18.34%	-9.65%

IRVH vs. AMJB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRVH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AMJB's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

IRVH vs. AMJB - Dividend Comparison

IRVH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%, while AMJB has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMJB Alerian MLP Index ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF	5.72%	4.89%	3.34%	3.69%	2.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IRVH and AMJB in my portfolio?

IRVH and AMJB have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IRVH or AMJB?

AMJB has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to IRVH (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRVH dropped -14.98% vs AMJB's -17.70%.

Which ETF is better, IRVH or AMJB?

On 1-year performance, AMJB leads with 20.98% vs -3.63% for IRVH. On fees, IRVH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IRVH has been the lower-risk option at 0.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IRVH or AMJB?

Over the 1-year period, AMJB has performed better with a 20.98% return vs -3.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IRVH or AMJB?

IRVH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for AMJB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IRVH or AMJB?

IRVH has the higher dividend yield at 5.72%, compared with 0.00% for AMJB.

What is the main difference between IRVH and AMJB?

IRVH is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while AMJB is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IRVH and 0.85% for AMJB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMJB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.