SWHRX vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SWHRX (Schwab Target 2025 Fund) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both funds - SWHRX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Charles Schwab, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, SWHRX returned 7.46%/yr vs 15.56%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SWHRX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

SWHRX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2025 Fund (SWHRX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWHRX achieves a 5.19% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, SWHRX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 7.46%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.

SWHRX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 2.33%
• YTD: 5.19%
• 6M: 5.43%
• 1Y: 14.24%
• 3Y*: 11.38%
• 5Y*: 5.29%
• 10Y*: 7.46%

VOO

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 5.04%
• YTD: 10.91%
• 6M: 10.93%
• 1Y: 28.04%
• 3Y*: 22.44%
• 5Y*: 13.90%
• 10Y*: 15.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWHRX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SWHRX Schwab Target 2025 Fund	5.19%	12.70%	8.78%	14.29%	-15.90%	10.31%	12.55%	18.66%	-6.00%	15.57%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	10.91%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	31.37%	-4.50%	21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SWHRX and VOO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010	0.93

The correlation between SWHRX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

SWHRX vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SWHRX	VOO
Technology	26.2%	35.7%
Financial Services	11.8%	11.6%
Industrials	11.5%	8.3%
Healthcare	10.5%	8.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	10.2%
Communication Services	8.9%	11.3%
Real Estate	7.7%	1.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	4.9%
Energy	4.3%	3.5%
Basic Materials	3.3%	1.8%
Utilities	2.0%	2.4%

Return for Risk

SWHRX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWHRX

SWHRX Risk / Return Rank: 61
SWHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SWHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
SWHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SWHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
SWHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 70
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWHRX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2025 Fund (SWHRX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SWHRX	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	2.39	-0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.36	3.25	+0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.43	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	3.16	-0.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.29	14.73	-2.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SWHRX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWHRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWHRX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SWHRX	VOO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	2.39	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.83	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	0.87	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.89	-0.33

Drawdowns

SWHRX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWHRX drawdown since its inception was -37.97%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWHRX and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWHRX	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.97%	-33.99%	-3.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.18%	-8.90%	+3.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.77%	-18.69%	+10.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.06%	-24.52%	-1.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.06%	-33.99%	+7.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.70%	+0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.34%	-3.69%	-1.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.17%	1.91%	-0.74%

Volatility

SWHRX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Target 2025 Fund (SWHRX) is 2.04%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that SWHRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWHRX	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.04%	2.84%	-0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.98%	8.90%	-3.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.20%	11.80%	-5.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.92%	16.81%	-5.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.50%	18.01%	-7.51%

SWHRX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWHRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SWHRX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

SWHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.63%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SWHRX Schwab Target 2025 Fund	9.63%	10.13%	7.82%	5.19%	5.72%	6.41%	2.94%	5.47%	5.95%	3.78%	5.31%	7.05%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.03%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWHRX and VOO in my portfolio?

SWHRX and VOO have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SWHRX or VOO?

VOO has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to SWHRX (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWHRX dropped -37.97% vs VOO's -33.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.