PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRTR vs. ITDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IRTR vs. ITDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares LifePath Retirement ETF (IRTR) and Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2040 ETF (ITDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRTR achieves a 4.55% return, which is significantly lower than ITDD's 8.11% return.


IRTR

1D
-0.60%
1M
0.24%
YTD
4.55%
6M
4.41%
1Y
12.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ITDD

1D
-1.22%
1M
0.09%
YTD
8.11%
6M
7.50%
1Y
20.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRTR vs. ITDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IRTR
iShares LifePath Retirement ETF
4.55%12.70%7.59%11.03%
ITDD
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2040 ETF
8.11%17.66%13.08%12.87%

Correlation

The correlation between IRTR and ITDD is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023

0.93

The correlation between IRTR and ITDD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRTR vs. ITDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRTR
IRTR Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IRTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IRTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRTR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

ITDD
ITDD Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ITDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITDD Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ITDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITDD Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRTR vs. ITDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares LifePath Retirement ETF (IRTR) and Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2040 ETF (ITDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IRTRITDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.36

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.66

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.24

11.44

-0.20

IRTR vs. ITDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the ITDD Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRTR and ITDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IRTR vs. ITDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRTR drawdown since its inception was -6.29%, smaller than the maximum ITDD drawdown of -12.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRTR and ITDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRTRITDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-12.46%

+6.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.82%

-7.56%

+2.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-1.59%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-1.25%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

1.76%

-0.65%

Volatility

IRTR vs. ITDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares LifePath Retirement ETF (IRTR) is 2.52%, while Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2040 ETF (ITDD) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that IRTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRTRITDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

4.07%

-1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.29%

8.62%

-3.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.34%

10.31%

-3.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.11%

11.56%

-4.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.11%

11.56%

-4.45%

IRTR vs. ITDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRTR has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than ITDD's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IRTR vs. ITDD - Dividend Comparison

IRTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than ITDD's 1.69% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IRTR
iShares LifePath Retirement ETF
3.01%3.03%3.03%0.85%
ITDD
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2040 ETF
1.69%1.82%1.56%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, IRTR and ITDD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ITDD has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to IRTR (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRTR dropped -6.29% vs ITDD's -12.46%.

On 1-year performance, ITDD leads with 20.04% vs 12.47% for IRTR. On fees, IRTR is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IRTR has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ITDD has performed better with a 20.04% return vs 12.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IRTR is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for ITDD.

IRTR has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 1.69% for ITDD.

Their fees differ too: 0.08% for IRTR and 0.11% for ITDD.

IRTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRTR and ITDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer